Longmire v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 61

ORDER GRANTING 60 Stipulation to Continue Expert Discovery Deadlines. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on September 2, 2011. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-01465-JSW Document60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3000 Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, California 94610 FOSTERemploymentlaw 11 Filed09/02/11 Page1 of 3 MICHAEL W. FOSTER (State Bar No. 127691) mfoster@fosteremploymentlaw.com MADELYN G. JORDAN-DAVIS (State Bar No. 181771) mjd@fosteremploymentlaw.com FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW 3000 Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, California 94610 Telephone: (510) 763-1900 Facsimile: (510) 763-5952 JOHN A. RUSSO, City Attorney (State Bar No. 129729) RANDOLPH W. HALL, Chief Assistant City Attorney (State Bar No. 080142) VICKI A. LADEN, Supervising Trial Attorney (State Bar No. 130147) CHRISTOPHER KEE, Deputy City Attorney (State Bar No. 157758) One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 238-7686 Facsimile: (510) 238-6500 X03508/692822 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF OAKLAND, HOWARD JORDAN and SEAN WHENT 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 DERWIN LONGMIRE, 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF OAKLAND, HOWARD JORDAN, SEAN WHENT, and DOES 150, inclusive, 22 23 24 25 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 10-01465 JSW (42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983) Date Action Filed: April 7, 2010 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY; CONTINUANCE OF EXPERT DISCLOSURE AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND ORDER THEREON 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY; CONTINUANCE OF EXPERT DISCLOSURE AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES Case3:10-cv-01465-JSW Document60 1 1. Filed09/02/11 Page2 of 3 Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND, HOWARD JORDAN AND SEAN WHENT 2 (“Defendants”) and Plaintiff DERWIN LONGMIRE (“Plaintiff”) (hereinafter referred to collectively 3 as “the parties”) hereby stipulate and jointly request an order extending the currently set expert 4 discovery dates by approximately one month, such that the currently set expert disclosure date of 5 August 12, 2011 would be moved to September 16, 2011, and the currently set last day for expert 6 discovery of August 23, 2011 would be moved to September 27, 2011. 7 2. This would allow the parties to potentially settle the case at the September 14, 2011 8 settlement conference without incurring the expense of experts. Accordingly, in the interest of 9 justice, and for good cause, the parties request the expert disclosure date be moved to September 16, 10 2011 and the last day for expert discovery be moved to September 27, 2011. 3000 Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, California 94610 FOSTERemploymentlaw 11 12 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September 2, 2011 FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW 14 15 /s/ Michael W. Foster Michael W. Foster Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND, HOWARD JORDAN AND SEAN WHENT 16 17 18 19 Dated: August 23, 2011 20 /s/ John Scott JOHN SCOTT Attorney for Plaintiff DERWIN LONGMIRE 21 22 23 SCOTT LAW FIRM Dated: September 2, 2011 LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L. BURRIS 24 25 26 /s/ John L. Burris JOHN L. BURRIS Attorney for Plaintiff DERWIN LONGMIRE 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY; CONTINUANCE OF EXPERT DISCLOSURE AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES Case3:10-cv-01465-JSW Document60 1 2 Filed09/02/11 Page3 of 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER Having read and considered the Stipulation continuing the trial date and corresponding 3 deadlines in this action, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 4 that the currently set expert disclosure date of August 12, 2011 is moved to September 16, 2011, and the 5 currently set last day for expert discovery of August 23, 2011 is moved to September 27, 2011. 6 7 8 DATED: September 2, 2011 __________ ___________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 3000 Lakeshore Avenue Oakland, California 94610 FOSTERemploymentlaw 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY; CONTINUANCE OF EXPERT DISCLOSURE AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?