Longmire v. City of Oakland et al
Filing
61
ORDER GRANTING 60 Stipulation to Continue Expert Discovery Deadlines. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on September 2, 2011. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011)
Case3:10-cv-01465-JSW Document60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
3000 Lakeshore Avenue
Oakland, California 94610
FOSTERemploymentlaw
11
Filed09/02/11 Page1 of 3
MICHAEL W. FOSTER (State Bar No. 127691)
mfoster@fosteremploymentlaw.com
MADELYN G. JORDAN-DAVIS (State Bar No. 181771)
mjd@fosteremploymentlaw.com
FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW
3000 Lakeshore Avenue
Oakland, California 94610
Telephone: (510) 763-1900
Facsimile: (510) 763-5952
JOHN A. RUSSO, City Attorney (State Bar No. 129729)
RANDOLPH W. HALL, Chief Assistant City Attorney (State Bar No. 080142)
VICKI A. LADEN, Supervising Trial Attorney (State Bar No. 130147)
CHRISTOPHER KEE, Deputy City Attorney (State Bar No. 157758)
One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 238-7686
Facsimile: (510) 238-6500
X03508/692822
12
13
Attorneys for Defendants,
CITY OF OAKLAND, HOWARD JORDAN
and SEAN WHENT
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
DERWIN LONGMIRE,
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF OAKLAND, HOWARD
JORDAN, SEAN WHENT, and DOES 150, inclusive,
22
23
24
25
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. C 10-01465 JSW
(42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983)
Date Action Filed: April 7, 2010
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT
DISCOVERY; CONTINUANCE OF
EXPERT DISCLOSURE AND EXPERT
DISCOVERY DEADLINES
AND ORDER THEREON
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY; CONTINUANCE OF EXPERT
DISCLOSURE AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Case3:10-cv-01465-JSW Document60
1
1.
Filed09/02/11 Page2 of 3
Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND, HOWARD JORDAN AND SEAN WHENT
2
(“Defendants”) and Plaintiff DERWIN LONGMIRE (“Plaintiff”) (hereinafter referred to collectively
3
as “the parties”) hereby stipulate and jointly request an order extending the currently set expert
4
discovery dates by approximately one month, such that the currently set expert disclosure date of
5
August 12, 2011 would be moved to September 16, 2011, and the currently set last day for expert
6
discovery of August 23, 2011 would be moved to September 27, 2011.
7
2.
This would allow the parties to potentially settle the case at the September 14, 2011
8
settlement conference without incurring the expense of experts. Accordingly, in the interest of
9
justice, and for good cause, the parties request the expert disclosure date be moved to September 16,
10
2011 and the last day for expert discovery be moved to September 27, 2011.
3000 Lakeshore Avenue
Oakland, California 94610
FOSTERemploymentlaw
11
12
13
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: September 2, 2011
FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW
14
15
/s/ Michael W. Foster
Michael W. Foster
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF OAKLAND, HOWARD JORDAN
AND SEAN WHENT
16
17
18
19
Dated: August 23, 2011
20
/s/ John Scott
JOHN SCOTT
Attorney for Plaintiff
DERWIN LONGMIRE
21
22
23
SCOTT LAW FIRM
Dated: September 2, 2011
LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L. BURRIS
24
25
26
/s/ John L. Burris
JOHN L. BURRIS
Attorney for Plaintiff
DERWIN LONGMIRE
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY; CONTINUANCE OF EXPERT
DISCLOSURE AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Case3:10-cv-01465-JSW Document60
1
2
Filed09/02/11 Page3 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having read and considered the Stipulation continuing the trial date and corresponding
3
deadlines in this action, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
4
that the currently set expert disclosure date of August 12, 2011 is moved to September 16, 2011, and the
5
currently set last day for expert discovery of August 23, 2011 is moved to September 27, 2011.
6
7
8
DATED: September 2, 2011
__________
___________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
3000 Lakeshore Avenue
Oakland, California 94610
FOSTERemploymentlaw
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY; CONTINUANCE OF EXPERT
DISCLOSURE AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?