PP&M Towing & Recovery, Inc. v. The City and County of San Francisco, California et al

Filing 33

ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson denying 16 Plaintiff's second application for temporary restraining order and ORDER setting briefing and hearing schedule on 24 Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction. Opposition due 04/22/10. Reply due 04/27/10. Hearing on 05/03/10 at 10:00 AM. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PP&M TOWING & RECOVERY, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. NO. C10-1466 TEH ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 On April 7, 2010, this Court denied Plaintiff PP&M Towing & Recovery, Inc.'s first 13 application for a temporary restraining order ("TRO"). PP&M filed a second application for 14 a TRO on April 16, 2010, along with a motion for preliminary injunction noticed for hearing 15 on May 24, 2010. 16 17 With good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The hearing on PP&M's motion for preliminary injunction shall be advanced from 18 May 24 to May 3, 2010, at 10:00 AM. Defendants shall file an opposition to this motion on 19 or before April 22, 2010, and PP&M shall file a reply on or before April 27, 2010. 20 2. In light of the advancement of the hearing date on the motion for preliminary 21 injunction, PP&M's second application for a TRO is DENIED. The Court does not find the 22 balance of equities to require injunctive relief in the two-week period before the motion for 23 preliminary injunction can be heard. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: 04/19/10 28 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?