Hosting.com, Inc. v. Ingenio, Inc.

Filing 6

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RRESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Deadline extended to 5/10/10. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/26/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2010)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-01471-JCS Document5 Filed04/23/10 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP ADAM FRIEDENBERG, Bar No. 205778 MAUREEN RODGERS, Bar No. 245876 One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 210-2800 Facsimile: (925) 945-1975 Attorneys for Defendant Ingenio, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV-10-1471-JCS STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT HOSTING.COM, INC. Plaintiff, vs. INGENIO, INC., doing business as AT&T INTERACTIVE, Defendants. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties hereby stipulate that Defendant's last day to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to May 10, 2010. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: April 22, 2010 GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP ADAM FRIEDENBERG MAUREEN RODGERS One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 By: /s/ Adam Friedenberg Attorneys for Defendant Ingenio, Inc. -1STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case3:10-cv-01471-JCS Document5 Filed04/23/10 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: April 22, 2010 PINNACLE LAW GROUP, LLP ANDREW A. AUGUST JOHN L. FITZGERALD KEVIN F. ROONEY 425 California Street, Suite 1800 Walnut Creek, CA 94104 By: /s/ Kevin F. Rooney Attorneys for Plaintiff Hosting.com UNIT ED 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: Arpil 26, 2010 S ISTRIC ES D TC AT T ER N F D IS T IC T O R -2STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT A C LI FO seph C. Judge Jo Spero R NIA OO IT IS S D RDERE RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?