M. Barbera & Figli, S.P.A., v. Vigo Importing Company

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING 22 Stipulation and approval to amended mediation date. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/5/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2010)

M. Barbera & Figli, S.P.A., v. Vigo Importing Company

Doc. 23

Case3:10-cv-01508-JSW Document22

Filed09/29/10 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

THOMAS W. COOK [California Bar No. 127626] 303 Bridgeway, Suite 425 Sausalito, California 94965 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff M. BARBERA & FIGLI, S.P.A. HOLLA ND & KNIGHT LLP Matthew P. Vafidis [California Bar No. 103578] Tianjing Zhang [California Bar No. 256759] 50 California Street, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant VIGO IMPORTING COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION M. BARBERA & FIGLI, S.P.A., Plaintiff, Case No. 3:10-cv-01508-JSW

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. vs. VIGO IMPORTING COMPANY; and DOES 1-20, STIPULATION AND APPROVAL TO AMENDED MEDIATION DATE

Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:10-cv-01508-JSW Document22

Filed09/29/10 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

STIPULATION TO AMENDED MEDIATION DATE Pursuant to the agreement of the parties as set forth in the Joint Case Management Conference statement dated July 16, 2010, mediation is to be completed by October 4, 2010. On September 21, 2010, this court approved an extension of time to mediate to October 25, 2010. The extension was based on the determination of the parties that settlement prospects are enhanced with such additional time. However, the parties have now identified a scheduling conflict which was not previously apparent, and therefore find they must again extend the time for mediation. The parties therefore agree to extend the time for completion of mediation to November 17, 2010, with a mediation date set now for November 11, 2010. Additional time, necessary to scheduling, will also allow receipt of responses to outstanding discovery, and communication with out of state and out of country clients. Resetting the date for mediation on or before Novem ber 17 may also allow the parties to resolve this case, and negotiations are ongoing. The parties request the Court approve this change in schedule for mediation. Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 28, 2010

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Approved: October 5, 2010 Date: _________________ Dated: September 28, 2010 __________________________ Matthew P. Vafidis Attorneys for Defendant VIGO IMPORTING COMPANY HOLLA ND & KNIGHT LLP __________________________ Thomas W. Cook Attorneys for Plaintiff M. BARBERA & FIGLI, S.P.A.

on behalf of, and by authority of:

__________________________ JE F FR E Y S. WHITE UN I T E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-