Gee et al v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.

Filing 110

SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/25/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2011)

*E-Filed 8/25/11*

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

Gary Gee, Roxanne Mazarakis, and Jody Soto,
individually, on behalf of other similarly
situated, and on behalf of the general public,

12
13
14

Case No. 3:10-CV-01509-RS
[proposed] SUPPLEMENTAL CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER

Plaintiffs,
vs.

15

SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., and DOES 1-50,
inclusive,

16

Defendants.

17
18
Having considered the record and the parties’ Joint Supplemental Case Management
19
Statement, and Proposed Order, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS
20
FOLLOWS:
21
Discovery in this matter shall be subject to the following limitations:
22
Defendant
23
1) Defendant shall be limited to 35 additional depositions.
24
2) Defendant may serve no more than 25 total Interrogatories on each Opt-In Plaintiff who is
25
deposed.
26
3) Defendant may serve no more than 40 total Requests for Production of Documents on
27
each Opt-In Plaintiff who is deposed.
28
4) Defendant may serve no more than 25 total Requests for Admission.

[proposed] SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

1

Plaintiffs

2

1) Plaintiffs shall be limited to 35 additional depositions.

3

2) Plaintiffs may serve no more than 25 total Interrogatories for each Opt-In Plaintiff who is

4
5

deposed.
3) Plaintiffs may serve no more than 40 additional Requests for Production of Documents for

6
7

each Opt-In Plaintiff who is deposed.
4) Plaintiffs may serve no more than 25 total Requests for Admission.

8
9

These limitations do not limit the evidence, witnesses, or testimony either party may use

10

in motion practice or at trial in this matter, subject to any Order of this Court, the Local Rules of

11

this Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Federal Rules of Evidence.

12
13

Except as outlined here, the Court’s April 15, 2011 Supplemental Case Management
Order shall remain in effect.

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
17

Dated:

8/25/11
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Court

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

[proposed] SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER