Ennova Direct, Inc. v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al

Filing 222

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFFENDANT PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/24/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2010)

Case3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document218-1

Filed06/21/10 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TODD A. NOAH (State Bar No. 152328) DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] C. DALE QUISENBERRY (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) POLASEK, QUISENBERRY & ERRINGTON, L.L.P. 6750 West Loop South, Suite 920 Bellaire, Texas 77401 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff ENNOVA DIRECT, INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) A-DATA TECHNOLOGY (U.S.A.) CO.,LTD., ) ) KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY ) CORPORATION, PHILIPS ELECTRONICS ) NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, ) PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SONY ) ELECTRONICS, INC., THOMSON INC., ) TRANSCEND INFORMATION INC., and ) VERBATIM AMERICAS LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) ENNOVA DIRECT, INC., Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION

-1ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS

Case3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document218-1

Filed06/21/10 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, and as a result of an agreement reached between plaintiff Ennova Direct, Inc. ("Ennova") and defendant Philips Electronics North American Corporation ("Philips"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 1. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Ennova and Philips, and over the subject matter

of this action. 2. Each claim made by Ennova against Philips, and each counterclaim made by Philips

against Ennova, in this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice on the basis of the settlement reached, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. 3. Philips has the right to assert any claims, counterclaims, or defenses, including but not

limited to patent invalidity and unenforceability, if Ennova asserts U.S. Patent No. 6,979,210 or any claims thereof against Philips based on any of its products in the future. 4. 5. 6. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Ennova's claims against the other defendants in this action shall remain pending. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to ensure that the terms and conditions

of the parties' settlement agreement are honored and enforced.
S
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-2ORDER OF DISMISSAL

A

C

LI

FO

seph Judge Jo

Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS

R NIA

6/24/10 Dated: _______

_____________________________________ JUDGE JOSEPH C. SPERO o C. Sper
NO

UNIT ED

19

RT U O

RT

H