Ennova Direct, Inc. v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al

Filing 266

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CORP. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/18/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2010)

Ennova Direct, Inc. v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al

Doc. 266

Case3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document265

Filed11/18/10 Page1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

TODD A. NOAH (State Bar No. 152328) DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: tnoahuv.dergnoah.com Attorneys for Plaintiff ENNOVA DIRECT, INC. DUNCAN PALMATIER (SBN 116692) e-mail: [e-mail] S. J. CHRISTINE YANG (SBN 102048) e-mail: [e-mail] THE LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTINE YANG 17220 Newhope Street, Suites 101 and 102 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Lawyers for Defendant KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION [Additional counsel appears on following page.] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) A-DATA TECHNOLOGY (U.S.A.) CO.,LTD., ) KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY ) CORPORATION, TRANSCEND ) INFORMATION INC., and VERBATIM ) AMERICAS LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) ENNOVA DIRECT, INC., Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS Before the Honorable Joseph C. Spero United States Magistrate Judge STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CORP, Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS

Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document265

Filed11/18/10 Page2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

C. Dale Quisenberry (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) POLASEK, QUISENBERRY & ERRINGTON, L.L.P. 6750 WEST LOOP SOUTH, SUITE 920 BELLAIRE, TEXAS 77401 TELEPHONE: [phone] FACSIMILE: [phone] E-MAIL: [e-mail] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ENNOVA DIRECT, INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CORP, Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS

Case3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document265

Filed11/18/10 Page3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Plaintiff Ennova Direct, Inc. ("Ennova"), and Defendant Kingston Technology Corporation ("Kingston") stipulate that they have reached final agreement on settlement of the claims made in this action and based upon the agreement, consent and approval of the parties, Ennova and Kingston, through their respective attorneys, further stipulate as follows: 1. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Ennova and Kingston, and over the subject matter

of this action. 2. Each claim made by Ennova against Kingston in this action is hereby dismissed with

prejudice on the basis of the settlement reached, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. 3. 4. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Ennova's claims against the other defendant in this action shall remain pending.

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY: Dated: November 18, 2010 /s/ Todd A. Noah * Todd A. Noah DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: tnoahuv.dergnoah.com /s/ C. Dale Quisenberry C. Dale Quisenberry POLASEK, QUISENBERRY & ERRINGTON, L.L.P. 6750 West Loop South, Suite 920 Bellaire, Texas 77401 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] e-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff ENNOVA DIRECT, INC.

Dated: November 18, 2010

1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS

Case3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document265

Filed11/18/10 Page4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Dated: November 18, 2010

THE LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTINE YANG /s/ Duncan Palmatier * Duncan Palmatier THE LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTINE YANG 17220 Newhope Street, Suite 101 and 102 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] e-mails: [e-mail] [e-mail] Lawyers for Defendant, KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

* indicates signature with permission by C. Dale Quisenberry

18 November IT IS SO ORDERED this ______ day of _____________________, 2010.
UNIT ED

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

_____________________________ JOSEPH C. SPEROSpero seph C. Jud Jo United StatesgeMagistrate Judge
R NIA
NO

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS

RT

H

2

Case3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document265

Filed11/18/10 Page5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS 3

PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system pursuant to Local Rule CV-5-5(b) on November 18, 2010. All other counsel not deemed to have consented to service in such manner will be served via facsimile transmission and/or first class mail.

/s/

C. Dale Quisenberry