Ennova Direct, Inc. v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al

Filing 276

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT TRANSCEND INFORMATION. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 12/9/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2010)

Ennova Direct, Inc. v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al

Doc. 276

Case3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document275-1

Filed12/09/10 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TODD A. NOAH (State Bar No. 152328) DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] C. DALE QUISENBERRY (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) POLASEK, QUISENBERRY & ERRINGTON, L.L.P. 6750 West Loop South, Suite 920 Bellaire, Texas 77401 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff ENNOVA DIRECT, INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) A-DATA TECHNOLOGY (U.S.A.) CO.,LTD., ) ) KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY ) CORPORATION, PHILIPS ELECTRONICS ) NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, ) PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SONY ) ELECTRONICS, INC., THOMSON INC., ) TRANSCEND INFORMATION INC., and ) VERBATIM AMERICAS LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) ENNOVA DIRECT, INC., Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT TRANSCEND INFORMATION INC.

-1Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS
Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:10-cv-01518-JCS Document275-1

Filed12/09/10 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
UNIT ED

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, and as a result of an agreement reached between plaintiff Ennova Direct, Inc. ("Ennova") and defendant Transcend Information Inc. ("Transcend"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 1. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Ennova and Transcend, and over the subject

matter of this action. 2. Each claim made by Ennova against Transcend, and each counterclaim made by Transcend

against Ennova, in this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice on the basis of the settlement reached, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. 3. 4. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to insure that the terms and conditions of

the parties' settlement agreement are honored and enforced.

9th IT IS SO ORDERED this ______ day of December, 2010.
S
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

RT U O

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-2Case No. 3:10-cv-01518-JCS

A

C

LI

FO

___________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE pero eph C. S
Judge Jo s

R NIA

NO

RT

H