Pestalozzi v. Patek Philippe S.A. et al
ORDER RESETTING CMC re 14 Case Management Statement filed by Raymond Pestalozzi. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/14/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)
JAMES M. BARRETT,ESQ. SBN 190274
LAW OFFICE OF JAMES M. BARRETT PLC
789 CASTRO STREET
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA94041
Attorney for Claimant Raymond Pestalozzi
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RAYMOND PESTALOZZI, an Individual
DBA THINK SECURE LABS
PATEK PHILIPPE S. A., THIERRY
STERN, an Individual.
Case No: CVI01558
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF
) CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
SET FOR SEPTEMBER 19, 2011
Honorable Magistrate Judge Chen
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS, Plaintiff Raymond Pestalozzi
Requests that the Case Management Conference set for September 19,2011 be continued for the
following reasons; .
Defendants PatekPhilippe S.A and Thierry Stem have no legal presence in the
United States of America but reside, operate and are incorporated in the Country
of Switzerland on the Continent of Europe.
Service of Process must be made through The Hague Service Convention.
All documents are to be translated into French for service in the native language.
The Law Offices of James M.Barrett PLC are utilizing the services of Crowe
Foreign Services of Portland, Oregon for service of the defendants.
Crowe Foreign Services are recognized as a foreign service organization.
Pestallozzi v. Patek
Request for Case Management Continuance
Crowe Foreign Services has provided sufficient infonnation that the service ofthe
complaint and associated documents will take a minimum of three months from
date of submission to serve of the Defendants.
Plaintiff Pestalozzi has been hampered with medical conditions including a stroke
and additionally has been on a respirator and heart control pump which has
prevented his ability to prepare all pleadings' translation for the service of
submission had a severe relapse causing his inability to participate in this matter.
PlaintiffPestalozzi has been recovering and following the last case management
Plaintiff apologizes to the Court for any delay, but does intend to participate in
this matter at his earliest possible ability.
That Plaintiff hereby requests that the Case Management Conference be continued
for a period of six months to insure service or process and a proper response from
. . This continuance is hereby requested based on the above infonnationand judicial
efficiency is best served by this continuance.
Dated: September 12,2011
regarding the requirements for service of process of the complaint it is the Order of this Court
that the CaseManagement Conference set for September 19, 2011 is hereby continued to
3/30/12 at 9:00 a.m. A joint CMC Statement shall be filed by 3/23/12.
_--'-_ _ _~_ _2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:~_ _ _ _ _ _ __
Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen RED
States O OR
Judge of the United T IS SDistrict Court
Pestallolzi v. Patek
Request for Case Management Continuance.
rd M. C
.. Having reviewed the Request for Continuance from Plaintiff, including the statements
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?