Herman Miller, Inc. v. Zuo Modern Contemporary, Inc. et al
Filing
123
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/15/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2011)
Case3:10-cv-01608-CRB Document122
Filed06/10/11 Page1 of 3
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
CASE NO. CV-10-1608 CRB
HERMAN MILLER, INC.,
4
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant,
5
6
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
U.S. District Court Judge
v.
[PROPOSED]
7 ZUO MODERN CONTEMPORARY, INC.;
AND DANRICK COMMERCE GROUP, LLC;
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
8
Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs;
9
STACKS AND STACKS; SPACIFY, INC.;
10
AND OFFICE FURNITURE OUTLET, INC.;
11
Defendants.
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
13
14
Plaintiff Herman Miller, Inc. (“Herman Miller”) and Defendant Danrick Commerce Group,
15
LLC. (“Danrick”) state that they have entered into a Settlement Agreement.
Consequently,
16
17
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), F.R.Civ.P., Herman Miller and Danrick hereby stipulate and request that
18 the Court order dismissal with prejudice of any claims and counterclaims between them in this civil
19 action, with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys’ fees. Herman Miller and Danrick
20 further stipulate that the Court shall retain jurisdiction of this civil action to enforce the Settlement
21
Agreement, if necessary, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or applicable
22
federal law.
23
UNIT
ED
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: __________________________
June 15, 2011
R NIA
D
RDERE
S SO O
_________________________________
IT I
25
HON. CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Court Judge r
e
R. Brey
Charles
Judge
LI
ER
H
1 of 2
RT
28
FO
NO
27
A
26
RT
U
O
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
C
N
F
ORDER AND DISMISSAL - CASE NO. CV-10-01608 CRB
D IS T IC T O
R
Case3:10-cv-01608-CRB Document122
Filed06/10/11 Page2 of 3
Case3:10-cv-01608-CRB Document122
Filed06/10/11 Page3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?