Apple Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company

Filing 10

CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a United States District Judge because either: [X] One or more of the parties has requested reassignment to a United States District Judge or has not consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge, or [] One or more of the parties has sought a type of judicial action (e.g., a temporary restraining order) that a United States Magistrate Judge may not take without the consent of all parties, the necessary consents have not been secured, and time is of the essence. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE SPERO ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE HAS BEEN REASSIGNED. APPLE INC., Plaintiff(s), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C10-01609 JCS NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 30, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk United States District Court By: Karen L. Hom Deputy Clerk cc: Intake

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?