Gallion v. Apple, Inc

Filing 17

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND COUNSEL (Muhlbach, Andrew) (Filed on 7/21/2010)

Download PDF
Gallion v. Apple, Inc Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PENELOPE A. PREOVOLOS (CA SBN 87607) PPreovolos@mofo.com ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (CA SBN 175694) AMuhlbach@mofo.com HEATHER A. MOSER (CA SBN 212686) HMoser@mofo.com SAMUEL J. BOONE LUNIER (CA SBN 252732) slunier@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CHARLENE GALLION, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC., a California corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. CV 10-01610-RS CLASS ACTION ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND COUNSEL ADR CERTIFICATION CV 10-01610-RS sf-2872389 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ADR CERTIFICATION CV 10-01610-RS sf-2872389 ADR CERTIFICATION FOR APPLE INC. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8(b) and ADR Local Rule 3-5(b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has read the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California" on the ADR Internet site (www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov), discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities, and considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution options. Dated: July 21, 2010 FOR APPLE INC. By: /s/ Chris Kyriacou Chris Kyriacou Litigation Counsel APPLE INC. Dated: July 21, 2010 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Andrew D. Muhlbach Andrew D. Muhlbach Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?