Gallion v. Apple, Inc
Filing
45
STIPULATION and Proposed Order re Consolidation of Related Cases by Charlene Gallion. (Fazio, Jeffrey) (Filed on 4/12/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Jeffrey L. Fazio (146043) (jlf@fazmiclaw.com)
Dina E. Micheletti (184141) (dem@fazmiclaw.com)
FAZIO | MICHELETTI LLP
2410 Camino Ramon, Suite 315
San Ramon, CA 94583
T: 925-543-2555
F: 925-369-0344
Steven A. Schwartz (pro hac vice) (SAS@chimicles.com)
Timothy N. Mathews (pro hac vice) (TNM@chimicles.com)
CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP
361 W. Lancaster Avenue
Haverford, PA 19041
T: 610-642-8500
F: 610-649-3633
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Charlene Gallion and
Christoper Corsi, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
CHARLENE GALLION, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated,
v.
APPLE, INC., a California corporation, and
DOES 1-100, inclusive,
CHRISTOPHER CORSI, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
20
21
22
v.
27
28
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
DANIEL CALIX, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated,
25
26
No. CV 10-03316-RS
APPLE INC.,
23
24
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONSOLIDATING ACTIONS
AND GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE
CONSOLIDATED AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
18
19
Plaintiff,
No. CV 10-01610-RS
v.
No. CV 10-05895-RS
Plaintiff,
APPLE INC.,
Defendant.
Hon. Richard Seeborg
1
Pending before the Court are three actions that have been formally related by order of this
2
Court: Gallion v. Apple, Inc., CV-10-01660, Corsi v. Apple, Inc., CV-10-03316, and Calix v.
3
Apple, Inc., No. CV-10-05895 (collectively, the “Related Actions”). Because of their similarity
4
and the parties’ voluntary coordination of discovery and other aspects of the litigation, the parties
5
have agreed that formally consolidating the Related Actions will further the parties’ objectives
6
regarding their efficient and expeditious resolution.
7
STIPULATE as follows:
8
9
10
11
1.
Accordingly, the parties hereby
The Related Actions are hereby consolidated into Civil Action No. CV 10-01610-
RS for pretrial proceedings before this Court. The consolidated action shall be captioned as “In
re Apple iPhone/iPod Warranty Litigation.”
2.
All related actions (as that term is defined in Civil Local Rule 3-12(a)) that are
12
subsequently filed in, or transferred to, this District shall be consolidated into this action for
13
pretrial purposes and Fazio | Micheletti LLP and Chimicles & Tikellis LLP shall continue to
14
serve as Co-Lead Class Counsel for the consolidated action.
15
3.
This Order shall apply to every such related action, absent order of the Court. A
16
party that objects to such consolidation, or to any other provision of this Order, must file an
17
application for relief from this Order within thirty (30) days after the date on which a copy of the
18
order is mailed to the party’s counsel, pursuant to Paragraph 4, infra.
19
4.
The parties shall file a Notice of Related Case pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12
20
whenever a case that should be consolidated with this action is filed in, or transferred to, this
21
District. If the Court determines that the case is related, the clerk shall:
22
a.
place a copy of this Order in the separate file for such action;
23
b.
serve on plaintiff' s counsel in the new case a copy of this Order;
24
c.
direct that this Order be served upon defendants in the new case; and
25
d.
make the appropriate entry in the Docket for the consolidated action.
26
27
5.
This Order is entered without prejudice to the rights of any party to apply for
severance of any claim or action, for good cause shown.
28
-1STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION
NOS. CV-10-01610, CV-10-03316, CV-10-05895
1
6.
Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) is not required to respond to the complaint in
2
any action consolidated into this action, other than a consolidated complaint or a complaint
3
designated as the operative complaint.
4
7.
Co-Lead Class Counsel shall prepare and file with the Court not later than May
5
30, 2011, a consolidated complaint containing the substantive allegations and claims for relief
6
pertaining to each of the Related Actions (the “Consolidated Complaint”). The Consolidated
7
Complaint shall be the operative complaint in the consolidated action, and shall supersede all
8
complaints filed in any of the actions consolidated herein. Apple shall have thirty (30) days from
9
the filing of the Consolidated Complaint in which to plead or otherwise respond.
10
11
8.
SO STIPULATED.
DATED: April 12, 2011
Jeffrey L. Fazio
Dina E. Micheletti
FAZIO | MICHELETTI LLP
12
13
Kimberly A. Kralowec
Elizabeth Newman
THE KRALOWEC LAW GROUP LLP
14
15
Earl L. Bohachek
THE LAW OFFICES OF EARL L. BOHACHEK
16
by
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Charlene Gallion,
on behalf of herself and the proposed class,
and Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel
19
20
21
DATED: April 12, 2011
Steven A. Schwartz
Timothy N. Mathews
CHIMICLES & TIKELLIS LLP
22
Rose F. Luzon
James C. Shah
SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Jeffrey L. Fazio
Jeffrey L. Fazio
by
/s/ Steven A. Schwartz
Steven A. Schwartz
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Christopher Corsi,
on behalf of himself and the proposed class,
and Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel
-2-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION
NOS. CV-10-01610, CV-10-03316, CV-10-05895
1
DATED: April 12, 2011
Philip Bohrer
Scott E. Brady
BOHRER LAW FIRM L.L.C.
2
3
John P. Wolff, III
Christopher K. Jones
KEOGH, COX & WILSON
4
5
6
by
7
/s/ Scott E. Brady
Scott E. Brady
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Daniel Calix
on behalf of himself and the proposed class
8
9
10
DATED: April 12, 2011
Penelope A. Preovolos
Andrew D. Muhlbach
Heather A. Moser
Samuel J. Boone Lunier
MORRISON | FOERSTER LLP
11
12
13
by
14
15
Attorneys for Defendant, Apple, Inc.
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
/s/ Andrew D. Muhlbach
Andrew D. Muhlbach
Dated:
, 2011
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION
NOS. CV-10-01610, CV-10-03316, CV-10-05895
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?