Marshall et al v. John Huffman IV, Real Content Media Group et al

Filing 189

ORDER RE DISCOVERY SCHEDULE 184 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PRESTON D. MARSHALL, 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 No. C 10-1665 SI Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DISCOVERY SCHEDULE v. JOHN HUFFMAN IV, et al., Defendants. / 12 13 Plaintiff has filed an administrative motion to extend by 90 days various discovery and filing 14 deadlines. Defendants object, contending that plaintiff did not meaningfully meet and confer prior to 15 filing the request, and that plaintiff’s own conduct has caused any timing difficulties he faces. 16 The Court finds that plaintiff did not made adequate efforts to meet, confer or discuss with 17 defendants either his timing issues or his further discovery needs. On this basis, the Court will not grant 18 the requested 90 day extensions. The Court does order an approximately 30 day extension for discovery 19 cut-off and expert disclosures, as follows: 20 21 22 23 Discovery cut-off Plaintiff’s expert designation Defendants’ expert designations Plaintiff’s expert rebuttal Expert discovery cut-off July 26, 2013 July 26, 2013 August 26 2013 September 13, 2013 October 14, 2013. All other dates remain the same, absent further agreement of counsel or court order. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 15, 2013 __________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?