Marshall et al v. John Huffman IV, Real Content Media Group et al
Filing
189
ORDER RE DISCOVERY SCHEDULE 184 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
PRESTON D. MARSHALL,
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
No. C 10-1665 SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY SCHEDULE
v.
JOHN HUFFMAN IV, et al.,
Defendants.
/
12
13
Plaintiff has filed an administrative motion to extend by 90 days various discovery and filing
14
deadlines. Defendants object, contending that plaintiff did not meaningfully meet and confer prior to
15
filing the request, and that plaintiff’s own conduct has caused any timing difficulties he faces.
16
The Court finds that plaintiff did not made adequate efforts to meet, confer or discuss with
17
defendants either his timing issues or his further discovery needs. On this basis, the Court will not grant
18
the requested 90 day extensions. The Court does order an approximately 30 day extension for discovery
19
cut-off and expert disclosures, as follows:
20
21
22
23
Discovery cut-off
Plaintiff’s expert designation
Defendants’ expert designations
Plaintiff’s expert rebuttal
Expert discovery cut-off
July 26, 2013
July 26, 2013
August 26 2013
September 13, 2013
October 14, 2013.
All other dates remain the same, absent further agreement of counsel or court order.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 15, 2013
__________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?