Hoyt v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/17/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2010)
<![CDATA[
E-Filed 9/17/10* Michael R. Bracamontes (SBN 242655) 1 Ryan J. Vlasak (SBN 241581) Kristen M. Ross (SBN 250917) 2 Bracamontes & Vlasak, P.C. 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 870 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 Phone: (415) 835-6777 4 Fax: (415) 835-6780 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Timothy Hoyt 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Law Corporation www.bvlawsf.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO.: 3:10-CV-01778-RS STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ACTION FILED: April 26, 2010 TRIAL DATE: November 7, 2011
Bracamontes & Vlasak
12 TIMOTHY HOYT, 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 16 GEORGE GASCON, and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive, 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 09/15/10 Defendants.
Contingent upon the Court's Order pursuant to this Stipulation, the parties to this action hereby 1. Plaintiff may file a first amended complaint to substitute Hank Lum for DOE 1. SO STIPULATED: Dated: 09/15/10 By: _/s/ Michael Bracamontes______ Michael R. Bracamontes, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff
20 agree as follows:
By:
_/s/ Kimberly Bliss____________ Kimberly Bliss, Esq. Attorney for Defendants
________________________________________ -1Hoyt v. City and County of San Francisco Stipulation and Proposed Order re: Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Case No. 3:10-CV-01778-RS
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Law Corporation www.bvlawsf.com
*Pursuant to General Order 45, §X.B., the filer of this document attests that he has received the concurrence of this signatory to file this document.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff may file a first amended
5 complaint. 9/17/10 Dated: __________________ ____________________________ Judge of the Northern District
Bracamontes & Vlasak
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
________________________________________ -2Hoyt v. City and County of San Francisco Stipulation and Proposed Order re: Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Case No. 3:10-CV-01778-RS
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
