Hoyt v. City and County of San Francisco et al
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/26/11)(rslc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 10-01778 RS
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO CONTINUE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; GEORGE GASCÓN; and
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3, plaintiff moves to enlarge the time for the filing of his
Opposition to defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment and for the corresponding hearing.
According to plaintiff’s counsel, due to unforeseen scheduling changes, he will be at trial in an
unrelated matter at the time plaintiff’s Opposition is due. Counsel also states that he sought a
stipulation from defendants, but has not yet heard back. Good cause having been shown, plaintiffs’
request for a two week extension in the schedule on defendants’ motion for summary judgment is
granted. Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be due by September 15, 2011. Defendants’ Reply is now due
on September 22, 2011. The hearing on September 22, 2011 is continued to October 6, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NO. C 10-01778 RS
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?