Hoyt v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 90

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/26/11)(rslc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2011)

1

*E-Filed 08/26/11*

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14
15

No. C 10-01778 RS

TIMOTHY HOYT,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO CONTINUE

v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; GEORGE GASCÓN; and
DOES 1-20,
Defendants.
____________________________________/

16
17

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3, plaintiff moves to enlarge the time for the filing of his

18

Opposition to defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment and for the corresponding hearing.

19

According to plaintiff’s counsel, due to unforeseen scheduling changes, he will be at trial in an

20

unrelated matter at the time plaintiff’s Opposition is due. Counsel also states that he sought a

21

stipulation from defendants, but has not yet heard back. Good cause having been shown, plaintiffs’

22

request for a two week extension in the schedule on defendants’ motion for summary judgment is

23

granted. Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be due by September 15, 2011. Defendants’ Reply is now due

24

on September 22, 2011. The hearing on September 22, 2011 is continued to October 6, 2011.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: 8/26/11
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NO. C 10-01778 RS
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE