Abokasem et al v. Royal Indian Raj Int'l Corp. et al

Filing 159

CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Ajith Nair, Anil Mital, Archana Kudva, Ashley Gilson, Dhiraj Tyagi, Greg Gilson, Hemant Prakash, Indrajit Roy, Jiji Nair, Jyoti Tyagi, Krishna Kudva, Krishna Shankar, Madhumita Sarkar, Manonmani Thangapandian, Moham ed Abokasem, Radhika Nair, Radhika Shankar, Ranjit Nair, Rathnakumar Badhan, Ravinder Prakash, Sujoy Majumdar, Sushma Roy, Vidya Kudva, Vinay Dilawri against Royal Garden City Enterprises Private Ltd., Royal Garden Villas Resort Corp., Royal Indian R aj Int'l Corp., Royal Indian Raj Int'l Holdings Corp., Royal Indian Raj Int'l Real Estate Fund Ltd., Anjula Yaseem Benjamin, Collins H. Benjamin, Manoj C. Benjamin, Maya Benjamin, Ravi Benjamin (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2012)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
MOHAMED ABOKASEM, et al.,
No. CV-10-1781 MMC

6
Plaintiffs,

7

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
v.

8
9
10

ROYAL INDIAN RAJ INTERNATIONAL
CORP., et al.,

11

Defendants.
/

12

() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have

13
14

been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The

15
16

issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

17
18

1.

Plaintiffs Rathnakumar Badhan and Manonmani Thangapandian shall have judgment

19

against defendants in the amount of $190,841.75, constituting the sum of their

20

deposit of $141,204.11 and prejudgment interest of $49,637.64.

21

2.

Plaintiffs Krishna, Vidya, and Archana Kudva shall have judgment against

22

defendants in the amount of $295,349.40, constituting the sum of their

23

deposit of $209,407.00 and prejudgment interest of $85,942.40.

24

3.

Plaintiffs Sujoy Majumdar and Madhumita Sarkar shall have judgment against

25

defendants in the amount of $211,182.00, constituting the sum of their deposit of

26

$147,819.75 and prejudgment interest of $63,362.25.

27
28

4.

Plaintiffs Ajith and Radhika Nair shall have judgment against defendants in the
amount of $302,849.10, constituting the sum of the following: their initial deposit of
$130,987.00, prejudgment interest of $45,643.04 thereon, their second deposit of

$100,000.00, and prejudgment interest of $26,219.06 thereon.

1
2

5.

Plaintiffs Ranjit and Jiji Nair shall have judgment against defendants in the

3

amount of $466,416.11, constituting the sum of their deposit of $339,608.00

4

and prejudgment interest of $126,808.11.

5

6.

Plaintiffs Krishna and Radhika Shankar shall have judgment against defendants in

6

the amount of $313,455.12, constituting the sum of their deposit of $215,250.00 and

7

prejudgment interest of $98,205.12.

8

7.

9

of $109,377.68, constituting the sum of his deposit of $80,431.00 and prejudgment

10
11

interest of $28,946.68.
8.

12

Plaintiff Vinay Dilawri shall have judgment against defendants in the amount of
$104,260.58, constituting the sum of his deposit of $76,614.00 and prejudgment

13
14

Plaintiff Mohamed Abokasem shall have judgment against defendants in the amount

interest of $27,646.58.
9.

15

Plaintiff Ashley Gilson shall have judgment against defendants in the amount of
$49,687.76, constituting the sum of her deposit of $36,537.00 and prejudgment

16

interest of $13,150.76.

17
18

10.

19

Plaintiff Greg Gilson shall have judgment against defendants in the amount of
$49,729.82, constituting the sum of his deposit of $36,537.00 and prejudgment

20

interest of $13,192.82.

21
22

11.

constituting the sum of his deposit of $224,852.00 and prejudgment interest of

23

$81,151.84.

24
25

Plaintiff Anil Mital shall have judgment against defendants in the amount of $306,003.84,

12.

Plaintiffs Ravinder and Hemant Prakash shall have judgment against defendants in the

26

amount of $69,519.60, constituting the sum of their deposit of $51,076.00 and

27

prejudgment interest of $18,443.60.

28

13.

Plaintiffs Indrajit and Sushma Roy shall have judgment against defendants in the

1

amount of $48,108.06, constituting the sum of their deposit of $33,215.00 and

2

prejudgment interest of $14,893.06.1

3

14.

Plaintiffs Dhiraj and Jyoti Tyagi shall have judgment against defendants in the amount

4

of $170,810.40, constituting the sum of their deposit of $122,484.00 and prejudgment

5

interest of $48,326.40.2

6

15.

With the exception of plaintiffs Dhiraj and Jyoti Tyagi, all plaintiffs shall jointly have

7

judgment against defendants in the total amount $500,000 as punitive damages, said

8

sum to be allocated by and among plaintiffs in accordance with their proposed judgment.

9

(See Doc. No. 142, filed July 10, 2012.)

10
11

16.

The judgment shall bear interest at the rate provided by law. See 28 U.S.C. § 1961
(setting forth means of calculation for postjudgment interest).

12
13
14

Dated: December 12, 2012

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

15
16
17

By: Tracy Lucero
18
Deputy Clerk

19
20
21
22
23
24
1

25
26
27
28

Interest on said award and on each of the awards set forth above is calculated
pursuant to the California Constitution, Article 15, Section 1. See id. (providing rate of
prejudgment interest for claims sounding in tort.)
2

Interest on said award is calculated pursuant to California Civil Code Section
3289. See id. (providing rate of prejudgment interest for claims sounding in contract).
3