Abokasem et al v. Royal Indian Raj Int'l Corp. et al

Filing 81

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AUTHORIZE ALTERNATIVE SERVICE ON DEFENDANT RAVI BENJAMIN PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(f)(3); VACATING HEARING. Granting 61 Motion for Alternative Service. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Jonathan M. Reymann (State Bar No. 206847)
([e-mail])
REYMANN LAW OFFICE, P.C.
2603 Camino Ramon, Suite 200
San Ramon, California 94583
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
MOHAMED ABOKASEM, RATHNAKUMAR BADHAN,
VINAY DILAWRI, ASHLEY GILSON, GREG GILSON,
KRISHNA KUDVA, VIDYA KUDVA, ARCHANA KUDVA,
SUJOY MAJUMDAR, ANIL MITAL, AJITH NAIR, JIJI NAIR,
RADHIKA NAIR, RANJIT NAIR, RAVINDER PRAKASH,
HEMANT PRAKASH, INDRAJIT ROY, SUSHMA ROY,
MADHUMITA SARKAR, KRISHNA SHANKAR,
RADHIKA SHANKAR, MANONMANI THANGAPANDIAN,
DHIRAJ TYAGI and JYOTI TYAGI

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

MOHAMED ABOKASEM, et al.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiffs,
v.
ROYAL INDIAN RAJ
INTERNATIONAL CORP., et al.
Defendants.

Case No. C 10-01781 MMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AUTHORIZE
ALTERNATIVE SERVICE ON
DEFENDANT RAVI BENJAMIN
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(f)(3) ; VACATING
HEARING
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:

May 27, 2011
9:00 a.m.
Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
7

23
24

Before the Court is the motion of plaintiffs Mohamed Abokasem, Rathnakumar Badhan,

25

Vinay Dilawri, Ashley Gilson, Greg Gilson, Krishna Kudva, Vidya Kudva, Archana Kudva,

26

Sujoy Majumdar, Anil Mital, Ajith Nair, Jiji Nair, Radhika Nair, Ranjit Nair, Ravinder Prakash,

27

Hemant Prakash, Indrajit Roy, Sushma Roy, Madhumita Sarkar, Krishna Shankar, Radhika

28

Shankar, Manonmani Thangapandian, Dhiraj Tyagi and Jyoti Tyagi (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO AUTHORIZE ALTERNATIVE SERVICE
(Case No. C 10-01781 MMC)

Page 1

1

for an order permitting Plaintiffs to serve defendant Ravi Benjamin by alternative means

2

pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

3
4

of
After consideration of the papers submitted in support and in opposition to Plaintiffs’

6

motion; all of the papers, pleadings, and records on file in this action; and any other evidence
and no opposition having been filed
that was presented at the time of the hearing, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion.
/\
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall be authorized, pursuant to Federal Rule

7

of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3), to complete service of the Second Amended Complaint on defendant

8

Ravi Benjamin by the following means:

5

9

•

Electronic delivery to the following two email accounts:

10

(1) [e-mail]; and

11

(2) [e-mail]

12
13
14

•

Delivery by private mail courier (Federal Express) to the following
addresses: 2704 Graveley Street in Vancouver, British Columbia;
and 5488 Smith Ave. in Burnaby, British Columbia.

Service of the Second Amended Complaint on Ravi Benjamin is to be completed as

15

June 3
described above no later than the following date: _________________________, 2011.

16

In light of the above, the hearing on the motion scheduled for May 27, 2011 is hereby
VACATED.
DATED: _________________
May 18, 2011

17
18
19

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO AUTHORIZE ALTERNATIVE SERVICE
(Case No. C 10-01781 MMC)

Page 2