Lafever v. Acosta, Inc.

Filing 54

SECOND DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 3/21/2011. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011)

Lafever v. Acosta, Inc.

Doc. 54

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 16, 2011, I ordered whichever party had a record of the meet and confer session between the parties at which they attempted to resolve the current discovery dispute, to lodge a copy of that record with the Court by noon on March 18, 2011. All the Court received was a series of positioning The Court deduces v. ACOSTA, INC., a Delaware Closed Corporation, also d/b/a ACOSTA TRUEDEMAND, LLC; and also d/b/a ACOSTA MILITARY SALES, LLC; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendant(s). MARIA LAFEVER Plaintiff(s), ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. C10-01782 BZ

SECOND DISCOVERY ORDER

letters and e-mails between the parties.

from that that the parties never met and conferred as required by paragraph 2 of the Pretrial Scheduling Order (Docket No. 30).

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the telephone conference scheduled for Wednesday, March 23, 2011 at 4:00 p.m. is taken off calendar. The Court will not attend to this matter until

the parties have met and conferred in accordance with the Pretrial Scheduling Order. Dated: March 21, 2011 Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge

g:\bzall\-bzcases\LaFever v. Acosta\Disc Ord 2.wpd