In Re Sony PS3 "Other OS" Litigation

Filing 110

STIPULATION [JOINT] AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc, Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC. (Ott, Carter) (Filed on 12/13/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DLA PIPER LLP (US) S A N FR A N C I S C O LUANNE SACKS, Bar No. 120811 luanne.sacks@dlapiper.com CARTER W. OTT, Bar No. 221660 carter.ott@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 555 Mission Street, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: 415.836.2500 Fax: 415.836.2501 Attorneys for Defendant SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC (erroneously sued as "Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc.") UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re SONY PS3 "OTHER OS" LITIGATION CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01811 (EMC) JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE -1WEST\222824652.1 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01811 RS (EMC) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DLA PIPER LLP (US) S A N FR A N C I S C O IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the parties have reached an impasse regarding several discovery issues that now require the Court's resolution. Specifically, the parties have met and conferred without success regarding multiple outstanding discovery items. Consequently, Defendant Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC ("SCEA") will move to compel testimony, information and production of documents and things by Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs' Initial Disclosures; and conversely, Plaintiffs will file a motion to compel and seek a protective order regarding certain discovery sought by SCEA (collectively, the "Discovery Motions"). WHEREAS, to expedite these disputes so as not to avoid further delay, the parties have agreed to the following expedited briefing schedule regarding the Discovery Motions, subject to the Court's approval. IT IS HEREBY AGREED TO AS FOLLOWS: The parties' pending discovery disputes will be briefed and heard pursuant to the following schedule: December 15, 2010: Discovery Motions filed and served. January 14, 2011: Opposition Briefs filed and served. January 26, 2011: Reply Briefs filed and served. February 9, 2011, 10:30 a.m.: Hearing regarding Discovery Motions. Should the Court set a date after February 9, 2011 for hearing on the Discovery Motions, Opposition Briefs must be filed and served 28 days before such hearing date and Reply Briefs must be filed and served 14 days before such hearing date. Dated: December 13, 2010 FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP By: /s/ Rosemary M. Rivas Rosemary M. Rivas Plaintiffs' Interim Co-Lead Counsel -2WEST\222824652.1 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01811 RS (EMC) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DLA PIPER LLP (US) S A N FR A N C I S C O Dated: December 13, 2010 __________________________________ ______ CALVO & CLARK, LLP By: /s/ James Calvo James Calvo Plaintiffs' Interim Co-Lead Counsel Dated: December 13, 2010 HAUSFELD LLP By: /s/ James Pizzirusso James Pizzirusso Plaintiffs' Interim Co-Lead Counsel Dated: December 13, 2010 DLA PIPER LLP (US) By: /s/ Luanne Sacks Luanne Sacks Counsel for defendant Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC I, Luanne Sacks, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing Joint Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing Schedule. I hereby attest that the above-referenced signatories to this stipulation have concurred in this filing. ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: By: Honorable Edward M. Chen United States Magistrate Judge -3WEST\222824652.1 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 3:10-CV-01811 RS (EMC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?