Woods v. Curry et al

Filing 29

ORDER DENYING PENDING MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/19/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 EARNEST. C. WOODS, II, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., 13 14 Defendants. __________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 10-1859 JSW (PR) ORDER DENYING PENDING MOTIONS (Docket Nos. 26, 27) 15 Plaintiff’s motion “to object” to the Clerk’s notice to pay his filing fee for appeal 16 is DENIED because the United States Court of Appeals has granted his application to 17 proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and relieved him of the obligation to pay the entire 18 filing fee at this time. Plaintiff’s “judicial notice motion for injunctive and declarative 19 relief” seeking a court order for “fundoplication surgery” is DENIED in light of the 20 dismissal and termination of this action. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: September 19, 2011 23 24 25 26 27 28 JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 EARNEST C. WOODS II, Case Number: CV10-01859 JSW 6 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 v. 8 BEN CURRY et al, 9 Defendant. 10 11 12 13 14 / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on September 19, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 15 16 18 Earnest C. Woods D 58091 P.O. Box 689 Soledad, CA 95696 19 Dated: September 19, 2011 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?