Zhang v. Ye

Filing 25

ORDER GRANTING 24 Stipulation to Continue CMC. Case Management Statement due by 10/8/2010. Case Management Conference set for 10/15/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/26/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2010)

Download PDF
Zhang v. Ye Doc. 25 Case3:10-cv-01906-JSW Document24-1 Filed07/23/10 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Kassra P. Nassiri (State Bar No. 215405) Andrew R. Kislik (State Bar No. 118772) NASSIRI & JUNG LLP 251 Kearny Street, Suite 501 San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: (415) 762-3100 Facsimile: (415) 534-3200 Attorneys for Plaintiff WENYUAN (AMY) ZHANG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION WENYUAN (AMY) ZHANG, Plaintiff, v. GREG W. YE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 10-01906 JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES Date: August 12, 2010 Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom 11, 19th Floor Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White Pursuant to the Stipulation of Plaintiff Wenyuan (Amy) Zhang and Defendant Greg W. Ye (appearing specially), and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE case management conference in this action is rescheduled for _____________, 2010, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 11 of October 15 this Court, and that the dates for the filing of the case management conference statement and for making initial disclosures are continued commensurately. -1ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 10-01906 JSW Dockets.Justia.com Case3:10-cv-01906-JSW Document24-1 Filed07/23/10 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: __________________ July 26, 2010 ______________________________ JEFFREY S. WHITE U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -2ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 10-01906 JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?