Toy v. Triwire Engineering Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 65

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2011)

1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7

No. C 10-1929 SI

JASON TOY and CHIEDU NWAMUO, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY

8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

Plaintiffs,
v.
TRIWIRE ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, INC.,
et al.,
Defendants.

/

13
Plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel discovery responses from defendant Triwire Engineering
14
Solutions, Inc. Triwire objects to the motion on numerous grounds, including on the basis that the
15
parties did not meet and confer regarding Triwire’s amended discovery responses prior to plaintiffs
16
filing the motion.
17
The Court directs the parties to engage in an in-person meet and confer regarding the disputes
18
raised by the parties’ letter briefs. To the extent that Triwire asserts that the discovery sought is
19
privileged (e.g., attorney client communications), Triwire shall produce a privilege log to plaintiffs prior
20
to the meet and confer session. If the parties are unable to resolve their disputes after the in-person meet
21
and confer, the parties shall submit a single joint letter of no more than 5 pages succinctly setting forth
22
the outstanding disputes and each party’s position. The parties need not resubmit any exhibits and may
23
cite the previously-submitted exhibits by docket number.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: May 19, 2011
26
27
28

SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge