Pryor et al v. Overseas Administrative Services, Ltd. et al

Filing 21

ORDER. The court ORDERS the following briefing schedule: Respondents' Opposition to motion to compel, doc #5 shall be filed no later than NOON on 5/25/2010. Petitioners' reply, if any, shall be filed on or before 5/26/2010 at NOON. The court will hear petitioners' motion on 5/27/2010 at 10:00 AM. (vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2010).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On May 12, 2010, petitioners in the above-captioned action filed a motion to compel arbitration. Doc #5. Petitioners MICHAEL PRYOR et al, Plaintiffs, v OVERSEAS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LTD et al, Defendants. / No C 10-1930 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA also requested an expedited hearing on their motion, which the court granted on May 18. Doc #13. Later that day, respondents declined to proceed in front of a magistrate judge and this action was reassigned to the undersigned. Doc #18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Respondents deserve a fair opportunity to respond in writing to petitioners' motion to compel. Keeping in mind the policy of prompt resolution of such petitions under section 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act, the court ORDERS the following briefing schedule: Respondents' opposition to petitioners' motion to compel arbitration, Doc #5, shall be filed no later than NOON on Tuesday, May 25, 2010. Petitioners' reply, if any, shall be filed on or before Wednesday, May 26 at NOON. The court will hear petitioners' motion on Thursday, May 27 at 10 AM. IT IS SO ORDERED. VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?