Bay Area Painters & Tapers Pension Trust Fund et al v. Valdez Painting, Inc. et al
Filing
14
ORDER re 13 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by District Council 16 Northern California Apprentice & Journeyman Training Trust Fund, District Council, 16 Northern California Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Marian Bourboulis, Bay Area Painters & Ta pers Pension Trust Fund, Les Proteau, District Council 16 of the International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, Doug Christopher, John Maggiore, Charles Del Monte. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/15/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2011)
Case3:10-cv-01931-CRB Document13
Filed06/14/11 Page1 of 3
1 Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607)
Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)
2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
3 San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 882-7900
4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile
mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com
5 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS
12 PENSION TRUST FUND, et al.,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
Case No: C10-1931 CRB
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
v.
15 VALDEZ PAINTING, INC., a California
Corporation, aka VALDEZ PAINTING; and
16 VAUGHN GINO VALDEZ, individually,
17
Defendants.
18
19
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to F.R.C.P., Rule 41(a)(1), Plaintiffs BAY AREA
20 PAINTERS AND TAPERS PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., voluntarily dismiss, without
21 prejudice, their claim against Defendants VALDEZ PAINTING, INC., a California Corporation,
22 aka VALDEZ PAINTING; and VAUGHN GINO VALDEZ, individually.
Defendants have
23 neither served an answer nor moved for summary judgment, and Plaintiffs have not previously
24 filed or dismissed any similar action against Defendants.
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
-1VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Case No.: C10-1931 CRB
P:\CLIENTS\PATCL\Valdez Painting\Pleadings\C10-1931 CRB Voluntary Dismissal 061311.DOC
Case3:10-cv-01931-CRB Document13
Filed06/14/11 Page2 of 3
1
It is therefore requested that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
2
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above-
3 entitled action, and that the foregoing is true of my own knowledge.
4
Executed this 14th day of June, 2011, at San Francisco, California.
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON
LAW CORPORATION
5
6
7
By: /S/Michele R. Stafford
Michele R. Stafford
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8
9
10
ORDER
11 Based on the foregoing and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, this action is dismissed, without
prejudice, and all dates in this matter are hereby vacated. The court shall retain jurisdiction of the
12 action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
J
ER
H
20
RT
19
R NIA
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
NO
18
IT I
FO
17
THE HONORABLE CHARLES R.D
RE BREYER
UNITED STATES SO ORDECOURT JUDGE
DISTRICT
S
LI
16
June 15, 2011
UNIT
ED
15 Dated:
RT
U
O
S
14
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
13
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Case No.: C10-1931 CRB
P:\CLIENTS\PATCL\Valdez Painting\Pleadings\C10-1931 CRB Voluntary Dismissal 061311.DOC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?