Bay Area Painters & Tapers Pension Trust Fund et al v. Valdez Painting, Inc. et al

Filing 14

ORDER re 13 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by District Council 16 Northern California Apprentice & Journeyman Training Trust Fund, District Council, 16 Northern California Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Marian Bourboulis, Bay Area Painters & Ta pers Pension Trust Fund, Les Proteau, District Council 16 of the International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, Doug Christopher, John Maggiore, Charles Del Monte. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/15/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-01931-CRB Document13 Filed06/14/11 Page1 of 3 1 Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607) Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 882-7900 4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS 12 PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 Case No: C10-1931 CRB VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. 15 VALDEZ PAINTING, INC., a California Corporation, aka VALDEZ PAINTING; and 16 VAUGHN GINO VALDEZ, individually, 17 Defendants. 18 19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to F.R.C.P., Rule 41(a)(1), Plaintiffs BAY AREA 20 PAINTERS AND TAPERS PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., voluntarily dismiss, without 21 prejudice, their claim against Defendants VALDEZ PAINTING, INC., a California Corporation, 22 aka VALDEZ PAINTING; and VAUGHN GINO VALDEZ, individually. Defendants have 23 neither served an answer nor moved for summary judgment, and Plaintiffs have not previously 24 filed or dismissed any similar action against Defendants. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -1VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case No.: C10-1931 CRB P:\CLIENTS\PATCL\Valdez Painting\Pleadings\C10-1931 CRB Voluntary Dismissal 061311.DOC Case3:10-cv-01931-CRB Document13 Filed06/14/11 Page2 of 3 1 It is therefore requested that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above- 3 entitled action, and that the foregoing is true of my own knowledge. 4 Executed this 14th day of June, 2011, at San Francisco, California. SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 5 6 7 By: /S/Michele R. Stafford Michele R. Stafford Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 9 10 ORDER 11 Based on the foregoing and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, this action is dismissed, without prejudice, and all dates in this matter are hereby vacated. The court shall retain jurisdiction of the 12 action. IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 J ER H 20 RT 19 R NIA . Breyer arles R udge Ch NO 18 IT I FO 17 THE HONORABLE CHARLES R.D RE BREYER UNITED STATES SO ORDECOURT JUDGE DISTRICT S LI 16 June 15, 2011 UNIT ED 15 Dated: RT U O S 14 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 13 N F D IS T IC T O R C 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case No.: C10-1931 CRB P:\CLIENTS\PATCL\Valdez Painting\Pleadings\C10-1931 CRB Voluntary Dismissal 061311.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?