Mitchell v. California Department of Mental Health, Napa State Hosptial et al

Filing 16

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 6, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2010)

Download PDF
Mitchell v. California Department of Mental Health, Napa State Hosptial et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GEORGE M. MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, et al., Defendants. / ORDER DISMISSING CASE No. C 10-01953 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On July 19, 2010, pro se plaintiff George Mitchell was ordered to show cause to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (Dkt. No. 15). Plaintiff was ordered to file a written response explaining why he did not file an opposition brief to defendants' motion to dismiss and why the motion should not be granted. A generous two and a half week deadline was given to plaintiff to respond. Plaintiff, however, was warned that failure to respond by August 5 will result in the immediate dismissal of his case. It is now August 6 and no response has been filed. For want of prosecution, this case is DISMISSED. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 6, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?