Leatherbury v. C&H Sugar Company, Inc. et al

Filing 47

ORDER continuing trial schedule. Jury Selection set for 1/22/2013 08:30 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Susan Illston. Jury Trial set for 1/22/2013 08:30 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Motion Hearing set for 11/9/2012 09:00 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Pretrial Conference set for 12/18/2012 03:30 PM before Hon. Susan Illston. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 6/12/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Kenneth N. Frucht, Esq. Frederick J. Geonetta, Esq. GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP 100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600 San Francisco, CA 94104 Attorneys for Plaintiff Telephone: (415) 433.4589 Facsimile: (415) 392.7973 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff GLEN LEATHERBURY Steven R. Blackburn, State Bar No. 154797 Matthew A. Goodin, State Bar No. 169674 Lauren M. Cooper, State Bar No. 254580 EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. One California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-5427 Telephone: 415.398.3500 Facsimile: 415.398.0955 sblackburn@ebglaw.com mgoodin@ebglaw.com bbrown@ebglaw.com Attorneys for Defendants, C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC. and AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 GLEN LEATHERBURY, 20 Plaintiff, 21 22 23 v. CASE NO. CV 10-01969 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRE-TRIAL DATES C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC., a Delaware Corporation, AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive, 24 Defendant. 25 26 27 The parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 28 WHEREAS; the parties took longer than expected to complete the electronically stored 6653779v1 Stipulation and Proposed Order CV 10-01969 SI -party vendor. 1 WHEREAS; the parties have agreed to mediate this matter and would like to do so 2 3 before incurring expense to prepare and oppose motions for summary judgment. WHEREAS; Plaintiffs would like to complete the depositions of third-party witnesses 4 5 Francine Cronin and Kim Merritt prior to participating in mediation. THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND REQUEST a continuance of the pre-trial dates 6 7 as follows: Dispositive motions: 8 Filed by: October 5, 2012 9 10 Opp. due by: October 19, 2012 11 Reply due by: October 26, 2012 12 Set for hearing no later than November 9, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. 13 Non-Expert Discovery cutoff: October 8, 2012 14 Expert designation: August 17, 2012 15 Rebuttal expert designation: September 17, 2012 16 Expert discovery cutoff: October 8, 2012 17 Pretrial conference: January 7, 2012 at 3:30 p.m. 18 Jury Trial: January 21, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -26653779v1 Stipulation and Proposed Order Case No. CV 10-01969 SI 1 DATED: June 11, 2012 GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP 2 By: /s/ Kenneth N. Frucht Kenneth N. Frucht, Esq. Frederick J. Geonetta, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs GLEN LEATHERBURY 3 4 5 6 DATED: June 11, 2012 EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. By: /s/ Lauren M. Cooper Steven R. Blackburn Matthew A. Goodin Lauren M. Cooper Attorneys for Defendants, C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC. and AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC. 7 8 9 10 11 12 [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pre-trial dates are continued as follows: 13 14 Dispositive motions: 15 Filed by: October 5, 2012 16 Opp. due by: October 19, 2012 17 Reply due by: October 26, 2012 18 Set for hearing no later than November 9, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. 19 Non-Expert Discovery cutoff: October 8, 2012 20 Expert designation: August 17, 2012 21 Rebuttal expert designation: September 17, 2012 22 Expert discovery cutoff: October 8, 2012 Dec. 18, Pretrial conference: January 7, 2012 at 3:30 p.m. 22 Jury Trial: January 21, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. 23 24 25 26 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 6/12/12 Date: _______________ 28 ________________________________________ JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT -3- 6653779v1 Stipulation and Proposed Order Case No. CV 10-01969 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?