Rey v. C&H Sugar Company, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER RE: TRANSFER LEATHERBURY V. C&H MATTER TO HON. SUSAN ILLSTON FOR ALL PURPOSES (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2011)

Download PDF
Rey v. C&H Sugar Company, Inc. et al Doc. 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Steven R. Blackburn State Bar No. 154797 Matthew A. Goodin State Bar No. 169674 Lauren M. Cooper State Bar No. 254580 EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. One California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-5427 Telephone: 415.398.3500 Facsimile: 415.398.0955 sblackburn@ebglaw.com mgoodin@ebglaw.com lmcooper@ebglaw.com Attorneys for Defendants, C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC. and AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION DAVID REY, Plaintiff, v. C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC., a Delaware Corporation, AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendant. CASE NO. CV 10-01970 SI AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO TRANSFER LEATHERBURY V. C&H MATTER TO HON. SUSAN ILLSTON FOR ALL PURPOSES 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS; this matter was filed on April 5, 2010 in Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa; was removed to federal court on May 6, 2010; and was assigned to Hon. Susan Illston on May 14, 2010. WHEREAS; also on April 5, 2010 in Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa; Glenn Leatherbury filed a case against C&H Sugar; captioned Glenn Leatherburry v. C&H Sugar Company, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., and Does 1-100, inclusive; Case No. C 10-00903; which was also removed to federal court on May 6, 2010; and was assigned to Hon. Vaughn Walker on May 14, 2010. FIRM:15590143v1 STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO TRANSFER MATTER TO HON. SUSAN ILLSTON Case No. CV 10-01970 SI Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Mr. Rey and Mr. Leatherbury are both represented by the firm of Geonetta and Frucht. While the two cases involve different claims, they will both involve many of the same witnesses, and the parties agree that much of the deposition discovery can be consolidated. WHEREAS, at a Case Management Conference in the Rey matter on February 25, 2011, Judge Illston informed the parties that if they desired to have the Leatherbury matter transferred to her for all purposes, she would accept such transfer. If the parties desired this transfer, Judge Illston suggested they file in both matters a stipulation and request to transfer the Leatherbury matter to her. WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agree to transfer the Leatherbury matter to Judge Illston for all purposes; THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND REQUEST: That the Leatherbury matter be transferred to Judge Susan Illston for all purposes. DATED: March 28, 2011 EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. /s/ Matthew A. Goodin Steven R. Blackburn Matthew A. Goodin Lauren M. Cooper Attorneys for Defendants, C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC. and AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC. By: DATED: March 28, 2011 GEONETTA & FRUCHT By: /s/ Frederick J. Geonetta Kenneth N. Frucht, Esq. Frederick J. Geonetta, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID REY -2FIRM:15590143v1 STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO TRANSFER MATTER TO HON. SUSAN ILLSTON Case No. CV 10-01970 SI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Upon reviewing the parties' Joint Stipulation and Request to Transfer the Leatherbury matter to Judge Susan Illston for all purposes. IT IS SO ORDERED 3/29/11 Date: _______________ ________________________________________ HON. SUSAN ILLSTON DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -3FIRM:15590143v1 STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO TRANSFER MATTER TO HON. SUSAN ILLSTON Case No. CV 10-01970 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?