Rey v. C&H Sugar Company, Inc. et al
Filing
55
ORDER continuing trial schedule to the following: Jury Selection set for 11/19/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Susan Illston. Jury Trial set for 11/19/2012 08:30 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Motion Hearing set for 10/5/2012 09:00 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Pretrial Conference set for 11/5/2012 03:30 PM before Hon. Susan Illston. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 6/12/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
Kenneth N. Frucht, Esq.
Frederick J. Geonetta, Esq.
GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP
100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Telephone: (415) 433.4589
Facsimile: (415) 392.7973
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DAVID REY
Steven R. Blackburn, State Bar No. 154797
Matthew A. Goodin, State Bar No. 169674
Lauren M. Cooper, State Bar No. 254580
EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
One California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-5427
Telephone: 415.398.3500
Facsimile: 415.398.0955
sblackburn@ebglaw.com
mgoodin@ebglaw.com
bbrown@ebglaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants,
C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC. and
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
20
21
22
23
CASE NO. CV 10-01970 SI
DAVID REY,
Plaintiff,
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE PRE-TRIAL
DATES
C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC., a Delaware
Corporation, AMERICAN SUGAR
REFINING, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
and DOES 1-100, inclusive,
24
Defendant.
25
26
27
The parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
28
WHEREAS; the parties took longer than expected to complete the electronically stored
6653779v1
Stipulation and Proposed Order
CV 10-01970 SI
-party vendor.
1
WHEREAS; the parties have agreed to mediate this matter and would like to do so
2
3
before incurring expense to prepare and oppose motions for summary judgment.
WHEREAS; Plaintiffs would like to complete the depositions of third-party witnesses
4
5
Francine Cronin and Kim Merritt prior to participating in mediation.
THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND REQUEST a continuance of the pre-trial dates
6
7
as follows:
Dispositive motions:
8
Filed by: August 31, 2012
9
10
Opp. due by: September 14, 2012
11
Reply due by: September 21, 2012
12
Set for hearing no later than: October 5, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
13
Non-Expert Discovery cutoff: October 8, 2012
14
Expert designation: August 17, 2012
15
Rebuttal expert designation: September 17, 2012
16
Expert discovery cutoff: October 8, 2012
17
Pretrial conference: November 5, 2012 at 3:30 p.m.
18
Jury Trial: November 19, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-26653779v1
Stipulation and Proposed Order
Case No. CV 10-01970 SI
1
DATED: June 11, 2012
GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP
2
By: /s/ Kenneth N. Frucht
Kenneth N. Frucht, Esq.
Frederick J. Geonetta, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DAVID REY
3
4
5
6
DATED: June 11, 2012
EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
By: /s/ Lauren M. Cooper
Steven R. Blackburn
Matthew A. Goodin
Lauren M. Cooper
Attorneys for Defendants,
C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC. and
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC.
7
8
9
10
11
12
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pre-trial dates are continued as follows:
13
14
Dispositive motions:
15
Filed by: August 31, 2012
16
Opp. due by: September 14, 2012
17
Reply due by: September 21, 2012
18
Set for hearing no later than: October 5, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
19
Non-Expert Discovery cutoff: October 8, 2012
20
Expert designation: August 17, 2012
21
Rebuttal expert designation: September 17, 2012
22
Expert discovery cutoff: October 8, 2012
23
Pretrial conference: November 5, 2012 at 3:30 p.m.
24
Jury Trial: November 19, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.
25
26
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
6/12/12
Date: _______________
6653779v1
________________________________________
JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT
-3Stipulation and Proposed Order
Case No. CV 10-01970 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?