Warren v. Paychex, Inc.
Filing
54
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING NOTICE DISTRIBUTION AND RELATED DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/19/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
STEVEN G. ZIEFF (SBN 84222)
DAVID A. LOWE (SBN 178811)
JOHN T. MULLAN (SBN 221149)
RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE LLP
351 California Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 434-9800 (phone)/(415) 434-0513 (fax)
sgz@rezlaw.com
dal@rezlaw.com
jtm@rezlaw.com
ROBERT S. NELSON (SBN 220984)
7 NELSON LAW GROUP
900 Cherry Avenue, Suite 300
8 San Bruno, CA 94066
(650) 794-2760 (phone)/(650) 794-2761 (fax)
9 rnelson@nelsonlawgroup.net
10 Attorneys for Plaintiff
DANIELLE WARREN and all others similarly situated
11
JACK S. SHOLKOFF, CA Bar No. 145097
jack.sholkoff@ogletreedeakins.com
BETH A. GUNN, CA Bar No. 218889
13 beth.gunn@ogletreedeakins.com,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
14 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200
Los Angeles, CA 90071
15 Telephone: 213.239.9800
Facsimile: 213.239.9045
12
16
Attorneys for Defendant
17 PAYCHEX, INC.
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20 DANIELLE WARREN, and all others
Case No. C 10-02006 JCS
21
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
NOTICE DISTRIBUTION AND
RELATED DEADLINES
similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
22
v.
23 PAYCHEX, INC.
Defendant.
24
25
Stipulation 07-1511.doc
26
27
28
///
///
///
Case No. C 10-02006 JCS
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
1
TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL
2
OF RECORD:
3
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Amended Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement and
4
5
the Amended preliminary approval order, on July 5, 2011, Defendant provided the Settlement
6
Administrator, Rust Consulting with data necessary to calculate the Class Members’ average
7
weekly salary and number of qualified work weeks, including the Class Members’ names, the
8
Class Members’ dates of hire in the Class position, the Class Members’ dates of termination
9
from the Class position, and the amounts of the Class Members’ weekly salaries during their
10
employment in Class positions during the Class period;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Amended Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement and
11
12
the Amended preliminary approval order the Settlement Administrator, Rust Consulting was
13
to mail the Court-approved Notice of Settlement by July 15, 2011, which Notice is to provide
14
individualized information as to the Class Members’ average weekly salaries and number of
15
their qualified work weeks;
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2011, Class Counsel and Defense Counsel were informed by
16
17
the Settlement Administrator that questions had arisen regarding the Class Member data
18
provided by Defendant which had rendered them unable to meet the July 15, 2011 Notice of
19
Settlement mailing deadline;
WHEREAS, the Settlement Administrator required clarification of the Class Member
20
21
data provided by Defendant and further instructions from counsel in order to complete the
22
necessary calculations and prepare the mail file pursuant to the settlement agreement, which
23
required additional analysis of the data. (see Declaration of Abigail J. Schwartz of Rust
24
Consulting, Inc., ¶ 5 (“Schwartz Decl.”) filed herewith);
WHEREAS, the Settlement Administrator’s questions regarding the Class Member
25
Stipulation 07-1511.doc
26
data provided by Defendant have now been addressed and counsel for the parties have
27
provided the necessary instructions (Schwartz Decl., ¶ 5);
28
///
1
Case No. C 10-02006 JCS
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
1
WHEREAS, the delay caused by the Settlement Administrator’s questions regarding
2
the Class Member data was such that the Settlement Administrator informed the parties on
3
July 14, 2011 that the Settlement Administrator requires additional time to make the
4
calculations necessary to include the required individualized information as to average weekly
5
salaries and numbers of qualified work weeks in the Notices and the Settlement Administrator
6
has further informed counsel for the parties that the additional analysis of the data and the
7
preparation and mailing of the Notice to the Class shall be completed by July 22, 2011
8
(Schwartz Decl., ¶ 5).
9
10
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED:
That the deadline for mailing of the Notice of Settlement is extended by one week to
11
July 22, 2011. The deadline for submitting objections and comments in favor of the
12
Settlement and for Class Opt-Outs (which is 60-days after mailing of the Notice) is
13
correspondingly extended by one week to September 20, 2011. Because the Court previously
14
continued the Final Approval Hearing by one week to November 4, 2011 (see Docket No. 52),
15
it is not necessary to continue the November 4, 2011 Final Approval Hearing date.
16
17
SO STIPULATED.
DATED: July 15, 2011
RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE LLP
18
19
By:
20
21
22
23
/s/ John T. Mullan
Steven G. Zieff
David A. Lowe
John T. Mullan
Attorneys for Plaintiff
24
25
Stipulation 07-1511.doc
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART P.C.
By:
26
27
28
DATED: July 15, 2011
/s/ Beth A. Gunn
Jack S. Sholkoff
Beth A. Gunn
Attorneys for Defendant Paychex, Inc.
2
Case No. C 10-02006 JCS
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
ORDER
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline for mailing
of the Notice of Settlement is extended by one week to July 22, 2011. The deadline for
4
submitting objections and comments in favor of the Settlement and for Class Opt-Outs (which
5
is 60-days after mailing of the Notice) is correspondingly extended by one week to September
6
20, 2011.
R NIA
per
LI
ER
FO
S
seph C.
Judge Jo
H
11
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate oJudge
RT
10
By:
NO
9
July 19
Dated: __________________, 2011
A
8
UNIT
ED
7
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
3
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Stipulation 07-1511.doc
26
27
28
3
Case No. C 10-02006 JCS
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?