Warren v. Paychex, Inc.

Filing 54

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING NOTICE DISTRIBUTION AND RELATED DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/19/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 STEVEN G. ZIEFF (SBN 84222) DAVID A. LOWE (SBN 178811) JOHN T. MULLAN (SBN 221149) RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE LLP 351 California Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 434-9800 (phone)/(415) 434-0513 (fax) sgz@rezlaw.com dal@rezlaw.com jtm@rezlaw.com ROBERT S. NELSON (SBN 220984) 7 NELSON LAW GROUP 900 Cherry Avenue, Suite 300 8 San Bruno, CA 94066 (650) 794-2760 (phone)/(650) 794-2761 (fax) 9 rnelson@nelsonlawgroup.net 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIELLE WARREN and all others similarly situated 11 JACK S. SHOLKOFF, CA Bar No. 145097 jack.sholkoff@ogletreedeakins.com BETH A. GUNN, CA Bar No. 218889 13 beth.gunn@ogletreedeakins.com, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 14 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 15 Telephone: 213.239.9800 Facsimile: 213.239.9045 12 16 Attorneys for Defendant 17 PAYCHEX, INC. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 DANIELLE WARREN, and all others Case No. C 10-02006 JCS 21 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING NOTICE DISTRIBUTION AND RELATED DEADLINES similarly situated, Plaintiff, 22 v. 23 PAYCHEX, INC. Defendant. 24 25 Stipulation 07-1511.doc 26 27 28 /// /// /// Case No. C 10-02006 JCS STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES 1 TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL 2 OF RECORD: 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Amended Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement and 4 5 the Amended preliminary approval order, on July 5, 2011, Defendant provided the Settlement 6 Administrator, Rust Consulting with data necessary to calculate the Class Members’ average 7 weekly salary and number of qualified work weeks, including the Class Members’ names, the 8 Class Members’ dates of hire in the Class position, the Class Members’ dates of termination 9 from the Class position, and the amounts of the Class Members’ weekly salaries during their 10 employment in Class positions during the Class period; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Amended Joint Stipulation of Class Action Settlement and 11 12 the Amended preliminary approval order the Settlement Administrator, Rust Consulting was 13 to mail the Court-approved Notice of Settlement by July 15, 2011, which Notice is to provide 14 individualized information as to the Class Members’ average weekly salaries and number of 15 their qualified work weeks; WHEREAS, on July 14, 2011, Class Counsel and Defense Counsel were informed by 16 17 the Settlement Administrator that questions had arisen regarding the Class Member data 18 provided by Defendant which had rendered them unable to meet the July 15, 2011 Notice of 19 Settlement mailing deadline; WHEREAS, the Settlement Administrator required clarification of the Class Member 20 21 data provided by Defendant and further instructions from counsel in order to complete the 22 necessary calculations and prepare the mail file pursuant to the settlement agreement, which 23 required additional analysis of the data. (see Declaration of Abigail J. Schwartz of Rust 24 Consulting, Inc., ¶ 5 (“Schwartz Decl.”) filed herewith); WHEREAS, the Settlement Administrator’s questions regarding the Class Member 25 Stipulation 07-1511.doc 26 data provided by Defendant have now been addressed and counsel for the parties have 27 provided the necessary instructions (Schwartz Decl., ¶ 5); 28 /// 1 Case No. C 10-02006 JCS STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES 1 WHEREAS, the delay caused by the Settlement Administrator’s questions regarding 2 the Class Member data was such that the Settlement Administrator informed the parties on 3 July 14, 2011 that the Settlement Administrator requires additional time to make the 4 calculations necessary to include the required individualized information as to average weekly 5 salaries and numbers of qualified work weeks in the Notices and the Settlement Administrator 6 has further informed counsel for the parties that the additional analysis of the data and the 7 preparation and mailing of the Notice to the Class shall be completed by July 22, 2011 8 (Schwartz Decl., ¶ 5). 9 10 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: That the deadline for mailing of the Notice of Settlement is extended by one week to 11 July 22, 2011. The deadline for submitting objections and comments in favor of the 12 Settlement and for Class Opt-Outs (which is 60-days after mailing of the Notice) is 13 correspondingly extended by one week to September 20, 2011. Because the Court previously 14 continued the Final Approval Hearing by one week to November 4, 2011 (see Docket No. 52), 15 it is not necessary to continue the November 4, 2011 Final Approval Hearing date. 16 17 SO STIPULATED. DATED: July 15, 2011 RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE LLP 18 19 By: 20 21 22 23 /s/ John T. Mullan Steven G. Zieff David A. Lowe John T. Mullan Attorneys for Plaintiff 24 25 Stipulation 07-1511.doc OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART P.C. By: 26 27 28 DATED: July 15, 2011 /s/ Beth A. Gunn Jack S. Sholkoff Beth A. Gunn Attorneys for Defendant Paychex, Inc. 2 Case No. C 10-02006 JCS STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline for mailing of the Notice of Settlement is extended by one week to July 22, 2011. The deadline for 4 submitting objections and comments in favor of the Settlement and for Class Opt-Outs (which 5 is 60-days after mailing of the Notice) is correspondingly extended by one week to September 6 20, 2011. R NIA per LI ER FO S seph C. Judge Jo H 11 JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate oJudge RT 10 By: NO 9 July 19 Dated: __________________, 2011 A 8 UNIT ED 7 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 3 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Stipulation 07-1511.doc 26 27 28 3 Case No. C 10-02006 JCS STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?