Braggs v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.

Filing 72

ORDER RULING on Objections. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on August 11, 2011. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

CHRIS BRAGGS,
Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 10-02031 JSW

v.

ORDER RULING ON
OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS

US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC,

13

Defendants.
/

14
15

The Court has received the parties’ objections to Exhibits and the disputed exhibits and

16

HEREBY RULES AS FOLLOWS:

17

Plaintiff’s Objections to Defendant’s Exhibits

18

Exhibit

Ruling

19

2

Overruled

20

10

Sustained in part and overruled in part. Defendant needs to

21

identify specific portions of the exhibit on which it intends to rely.

22

The entire exhibit is not relevant.

23

13

Overruled

24

100

Overruled

25

101

Overuled

26

121/135

Overruled.

27
28

The Court maintains its rulings on Defendant’s objections to Plaintiff’s Exhibits 47 and
48. They are excluded pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 408.

1
2
3

If the parties have not already done so, they should prepare an amended Exhibit list that
removes references to any duplicative exhibits and corrects any erroneous references.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: August 11, 2011
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2