Watson v. Wells Fargo et al
ORDER GRANTING 19 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on July 9, 2010. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2010)
Watson v. Wells Fargo et al
Filed07/06/10 Page1 of 4
I 2 3
Mark C. Watson (#178980) markw(ämarkcwatson.com THE LAW OFFICES OF MARK C. WATSON 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 341 Burlingame, CA 94010 Tel: (650) 692-4001 Fax: (650) 692-4004 Attorney for Plaintiff James D. Watson Jeremy E. Shulman (#257582) jshulman2afrct.com ANGLTN, FEE WELLING, RASMUSSEN CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN, LLP 199 South Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600 Pasadena,CA 91101 Tel: (626) 535-1900 Fax: (626) 577-7764 Attorneys for Defendant Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. formerly known as Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, formerly known as World Savings Banic, FSB ("Wachovia") Edward A. Treder(#116307) edwardt(2Idfgroup.com BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP 20955 Pathfinder Road, Suite 300 Diamond Bar, California 91765 Tel: (626) 371-7032 Fax: (626) 595-7640 Attorneys for Defendant NT)EX WEST, LEC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES D. WATSON, Plaintiff, vs. WELLS FARGO SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO WACHOVIA BANK, a California Corporation and INDEX WEST, LLC, An entity of unknown form and DOES ONE THROUGH TEN INCLUSIVE, Defendants.
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 3:10-CV-02058-JSW [The Honorable Jeffrey S. White, th 19 Courtroom Floor] STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a) AND ORDER THEREON
3:1 O--CV--O2O58--JSV STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(1
Filed07/06/10 Page2 of 4
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiff James D. Watson, Defendant 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: July 6, 2010 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/Edward A. Treder Edward A. Treder edwardtbdfgroup.com Attorneys for Defendant NOEX WEST, LLC Dated: July 6, 2010 BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP By: Is/Jeremy B. Shulman Jeremy E. Shulrnan jshuhnan(2iafrct.com Attorneys for Defendant, Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. formerly known as Waehovia Mortgage, FSB, formerly known as World Savings Bank, FSB Dated: July 6, 2010 ANGLIN, FLE WELLING, RASMUSSEN, CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP Is/Mark C. Watson Mark C. Watson email@example.com Attorney for Plaintiff, James D. Watson By: Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Banlc, N.A., formerly known as Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, formerly known as World Savings Bank, FSB ("Wachovia"), and Defendant NDEX WEST, LLC ("NOEX"), by their counsel of record, stipulate to dismiss the above captioned action with prejudice as to all defendants. Plaintiff James D. Watson, Defendant Wachovia, and Defendant NDEX will each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. The parties consent to entry ofjudgment in accordance with the terms of this stipulation. IT IS SO STIPULATED. THE LAW OFFICES OF MARK C. WATSON
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Jeremy E. Shulman, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 6,2010, at Pasadena, California. Is/Jeremy E. Shulman Jeremy E. Shulman
3:1 O--CV--02058--JSVJ STU'ULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)
Filed07/06/10 Page3 of 4
1 2 3 IT IS ORDERED: 4 1. 5 2. 6
ORDER ON STIPULATION Having read and filed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing:
This action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; and Each party will each bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT .TUIJGE
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 iS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
3:1 O-CV-02058-JSW STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?