Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation

Filing 176

ORDER re: mediation (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
ROGER L. COOK (State Bar No. 55208)
ROBERT D. TADLOCK (State Bar No. 238479)
Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
ERIC M. HUTCHINS (State Bar No. 245462)
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

9
10
11
12

LAW OFFICES OF JORDAN TRENT JONES
JORDAN TRENT JONES (State Bar No. 166600)
100 Spear Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

13
14

Attorneys for Defendant
SIDENSE CORP.

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18

KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY INC.,
Plaintiff,

19
20
21
22

v.

Case No. CV 10-02066 SI
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
MEDIATION

SIDENSE CORP.,
Defendant.

23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MEDIATION
CASE NO. CV 10-02066 SI

-1-

JOINT STIPULATION

1
2
3
4

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Kilopass Technology, Inc. (“Kilopass”) and
Defendant Sidense Corp. (“Sidense”) hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, the Corrected Pretrial Preparation Order (Dkt. No. 155) mandates that the

5

mediation session for both this case and the related action of Sidense Corp. v. Kilopass Tech., Inc.,

6

Case No. CV 11-4112 SI (the “Sidense lawsuit”) shall be completed by the end of 2011;

7

WHEREAS, the Corrected Pretrial Order states the “mediator selected for this case may

8

also be appointed to the related case” but does not command the parties to conduct a joint

9

mediation session for both cases;

10
11
12

WHEREAS, Sidense and Kilopass, in consultation with the ADR Program Staff Attorneys
and the assigned mediator, have agreed to mediate both cases at the same time;
WHEREAS, Sidense’s original Complaint was dismissed after Sidense filed a First

13

Amended Complaint adding new allegations, and Kilopass has filed a Second Motion to Dismiss

14

Sidense’s First Amended Complaint and does not believe the scope of that case will be sufficiently

15

clear to effectively mediate by the end of 2011;

16

WHEREAS, the extension requested herein would not impact the remaining schedule;

17

ACCORDINGLY, Kilopass and Sidense hereby request that the Court extend the

18

deadline to complete a joint mediation for both this action and the Sidense Lawsuit until

19

Wednesday, February 29, 2012.

20

DATED: December 21, 2011

By: ___/s/ Robert D. Tadlock ________________

21

Robert D. Tadlock

22

Attorneys for Defendant,
SIDENSE CORP.

23
24
25

DATED: December 21, 2011

By: __/s/ Imran A. Khaliq _________
Imran A. Khaliq

26
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY INC.

27
28
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MEDIATION
CASE NO. CV 10-02066 SI

-2-

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

1
2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained the

3

concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is

4

indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records

5

to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection

6

upon request.

7
8

DATED: December 21, 2011

By: /s/ Robert D. Tadlock
Robert D. Tadlock

9

Attorneys for Defendant,
SIDENSE CORP.

10
11
12
13

ORDER

14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
18

12/23/11
____________________
DATE

_______________________________
THE HON. SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MEDIATION
CASE NO. CV 10-02066 SI

-3-