Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation

Filing 281

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME; RESETTING TIME FOR HEARING 279 in case 3:10-cv-02066-SI; 106 in case 3:11-cv-04112-SI (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME; RESETTING TIME FOR HEARING Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 Nos. C 10-02066 SI and 11-4112 SI KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY INC., SIDENSE CORPORATION, Defendant. 14 / 15 16 Kilopass’ motion for certification of the Court’s summary judgment of non-infringement as a 17 final judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) is currently set for hearing on September 11, 2012. 18 Sidense Corp. now seeks leave to file another summary judgment motion on Kilopass’ business 19 tort claims, and requests that its motion for leave also be heard on September 11, 2012, with an 20 expedited briefing schedule. 21 . The Court GRANTS Sidense’s motion to shorten time, and alters the hearing dates, as follows: 22 1. The hearing on both pending motions – Kilopass’ motion for Rule 54(b) certification 23 and Sidense’s cross-motion for leave to file a further summary judgment motion – will 24 be held on September 12, 2012 at 3:30 p.m. 25 2. Pursuant to the expedited briefing schedule, Kilopass must file its opposition to 26 Sidense’s cross-motion for leave by September 7, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. Sidense must file 27 any reply to the opposition by September 10, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. 28 1 3. The briefing schedule on Kilopass’ Rule 54(b) certification motion remains unchanged. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: September 5, 2012 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?