Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation
Filing
281
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME; RESETTING TIME FOR HEARING 279 in case 3:10-cv-02066-SI; 106 in case 3:11-cv-04112-SI (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/5/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME; RESETTING TIME
FOR HEARING
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
Nos. C 10-02066 SI and 11-4112 SI
KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY INC.,
SIDENSE CORPORATION,
Defendant.
14
/
15
16
Kilopass’ motion for certification of the Court’s summary judgment of non-infringement as a
17
final judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) is currently set for hearing on September 11, 2012.
18
Sidense Corp. now seeks leave to file another summary judgment motion on Kilopass’ business
19
tort claims, and requests that its motion for leave also be heard on September 11, 2012, with an
20
expedited briefing schedule.
21
.
The Court GRANTS Sidense’s motion to shorten time, and alters the hearing dates, as follows:
22
1.
The hearing on both pending motions – Kilopass’ motion for Rule 54(b) certification
23
and Sidense’s cross-motion for leave to file a further summary judgment motion – will
24
be held on September 12, 2012 at 3:30 p.m.
25
2.
Pursuant to the expedited briefing schedule, Kilopass must file its opposition to
26
Sidense’s cross-motion for leave by September 7, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. Sidense must file
27
any reply to the opposition by September 10, 2012 at 5:00 p.m.
28
1
3.
The briefing schedule on Kilopass’ Rule 54(b) certification motion remains unchanged.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: September 5, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?