Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation
Filing
383
***ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 377 Motion to Stay, signed on 4/15/13 (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2013)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
6
7
8
9
KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC., a
California Corporation,
Case No. 3:10-cv-02066 SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
Plaintiff,
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 62(d) TO STAY
ENFORCEMENT OF TAXABLE COSTS AND
v.
SIDENSE CORP., a Canadian
Corporation,
BOND
Defendant.
10
11
12
13
Pro. 62(d), to stay execution of the taxation of costs entered on March 6, 2013 (Dkt. No. 376)
14
supersedeas
15
16
17
bond amount of $66,076.77.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
4/15
Dated: ______________________, 2013
20
By: ______________________________
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Court Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-02066 SI
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I, Jocasta Wong, hereby declare:
3
I am employed in the City and County of Palo Alto, California in the office of a member of
4
the bar of this court whose direction the following service was made. I am over the age of eighteen
5
years and not a party to the within action. My business address is SNR Denton US LLP, 1530 Page
6
Mill Road, Suite 200, Palo Alto, California 94304.
7
On March 15, 2013, the following documents, described as:
8
[PROPOSED] ORD
MOTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 62(d) TO STAY
ENFORCEMENT OF TAXABLE COSTS AND APPROVAL OF
9
10
11
to be served via CM/ECF by the Clerk of the Court, upon all counsel of record registered to receive
12
13
14
15
not registered for electronic filing.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed on
March 15, 2013, in Palo Alto, California.
16
/s/ Jocasta Wong
Jocasta Wong
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-02066 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?