Ringgold v. Williams et al

Filing 20

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE. Responses due by 8/18/2010. Replies due by 8/27/2010. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 18 MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANT OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; MOTION TO ST RIKE; NOTICE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES, 19 MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANT OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; RE-NOTICE OF MOTION TO STRIKE; NOTICE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 08/03/10. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2010) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/3/2010: # 1 certificate of service) (sis, COURT STAFF).

Ringgold v. Williams et al

Doc. 20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA REGINALD BUDDY RINGGOLD, III, Plaintiff, v. TRISTAN WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. / ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE No. C 10-02110 JSW

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This matter is set for a hearing on September 24, 2010 on the motion to dismiss and to strike filed by Defendants Oakland Police Department and the City of Oakland ("Defendants"). The Court HEREBY ORDERS that an opposition to the motion shall be filed by no later than August 18, 2010 and a reply brief shall be filed by no later than August 27, 2010. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to oppose the motion may result in dismissal of this action. If the Court determines that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument, it will so advise the parties in advance of the hearing date. If the parties wish to modify this schedule, they may submit for the Court's consideration a stipulation and proposed order demonstrating good cause for any modification requested. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 08/03/10

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com