Delegat's Wine Estate Limited v. American Wine Distributors, Inc. et al

Filing 132

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman denying 130 Stipulation (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-02215-BZ Document130 Filed03/28/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 DELEGAT’S WINE ESTATE LIMITED, Plaintiff, 6 7 8 9 vs. AMERICAN WINE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. and MICHAEL DENNY, individual Defendants. 10 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV 10 2215 EDL STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL AND EXTENDING MOTION HEARING DATE Proposed Date: May 16, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: C Magistrate Judge: Hon. Bernard Zimmerman 11 12 Plaintiff, DELEGAT’S WINE ESTATE LIMITED and defendants, AMERICAN WINE 13 DISTRIBUTORS, INC. and MICHAEL DENNY, by and through their attorneys of record, 14 stipulate and respectfully request that: 15 The Court grant a two-week extension for plaintiff to respond to defendant’s motion for a 16 new trial until April 24, 2012. Defendant’s reply shall become due by May 1, 2012 and the 17 Motion Hearing to be set for June 6, 2012 at 10:00 AM, or at such other time as set by the Court, 18 in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. 19 DATED: March 28, 2012 20 MCDOWALL COTTER, APC 21 By : David S. Rosenbaum /s/ David S. Rosenbaum, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Delegat's Wine Estate Limited 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL Case No. C-10-02215 BZ DELEGAT’S WINE ESTATE LIMITED V. AMERICAN WINE DISTRIBUTORS, INC.ET AL DENIED. No cause shown. Proposed dates are unexceptable to the Court. D DENIE R NIA UNIT ED S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S Case3:10-cv-02215-BZ Document130 Filed03/28/12 Page2 of 2 erman FO RT A H ER LI NO imm rnard Z udge Be J N F D IS T IC T O R C Dated: 3/30/2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?