Delegat's Wine Estate Limited v. American Wine Distributors, Inc. et al
Filing
132
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman denying 130 Stipulation (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012)
Case3:10-cv-02215-BZ Document130 Filed03/28/12 Page1 of 2
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
DELEGAT’S WINE ESTATE LIMITED,
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
vs.
AMERICAN WINE DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
and MICHAEL DENNY, individual
Defendants.
10
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: CV 10 2215 EDL
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A
NEW TRIAL AND EXTENDING
MOTION HEARING DATE
Proposed Date: May 16, 2012
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom: C
Magistrate Judge: Hon. Bernard
Zimmerman
11
12
Plaintiff, DELEGAT’S WINE ESTATE LIMITED and defendants, AMERICAN WINE
13
DISTRIBUTORS, INC. and MICHAEL DENNY, by and through their attorneys of record,
14
stipulate and respectfully request that:
15
The Court grant a two-week extension for plaintiff to respond to defendant’s motion for a
16
new trial until April 24, 2012. Defendant’s reply shall become due by May 1, 2012 and the
17
Motion Hearing to be set for June 6, 2012 at 10:00 AM, or at such other time as set by the Court,
18
in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco.
19
DATED: March 28, 2012
20
MCDOWALL COTTER, APC
21
By : David S. Rosenbaum /s/
David S. Rosenbaum, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
Delegat's Wine Estate Limited
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL
Case No. C-10-02215 BZ
DELEGAT’S WINE ESTATE LIMITED V.
AMERICAN WINE DISTRIBUTORS, INC.ET AL
DENIED. No cause shown. Proposed dates are
unexceptable to the Court.
D
DENIE
R NIA
UNIT
ED
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
Case3:10-cv-02215-BZ Document130 Filed03/28/12 Page2 of 2
erman
FO
RT
A
H
ER
LI
NO
imm
rnard Z
udge Be
J
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Dated: 3/30/2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?