The Board of Trustees of the California Winery Worker's Pension Trust Fund v. Union Bank, N.A.

Filing 31

ORDER setting motions for 1/28/11 @ 9:00 a.m. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)

Download PDF
The Board of Trustees of the California Winery Worker's Pension Trust Fund v. Union Bank, N.A. Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 UNION BANK, N.A., 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. CORY BROWN, MICHAEL CRAIN, JERRY O. ELDREDGE, HUGH FRANKLIN, JOE HALCON, ALAN PEGARELLA, ROBERT RAMIREZ, CINDY SMITH, CHARLES FEAVER, MICHAEL FRANZIA, ROBERT M. LIEBER, MARC C. MONDAVI, DIANNE NURY, FRED WIEBEL, Jr., and DOES 1-20 inclusive. Third-Party Defendants. ___________________________________________ [P r o p o se d ] Order C a s e No. C 10-2240 SI UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA WINERY WORKERS' PENSION TRUST FUND, Plaintiff, v. UNION BANK, N.A., Defendant. ___________________________________________ UNION BANK, N.A., Counter-Plaintiff, v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA WINERY WORKERS' PENSION TRUST FUND Counter-Defendant. ___________________________________________ Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 10-2240 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSES TO UNION BANK'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRDPARTY COMPLAINT Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: ___________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court sets the following schedule for the responses to Union Bank's Amended Counterclaim (Dkt. # 26) and Third-Party Complaint (Dkt. # 18): 12(b)(6) Motions Due: Oppositions Due: Replies Due: Hearing on Motions: October 29, 2010 December 17, 2010 January 7, 2011 January 28, 2011 ___________________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE [P r o p o se d ] Order C a s e No. C 10-2240 SI Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?