The Board of Trustees of the California Winery Worker's Pension Trust Fund v. Union Bank, N.A.

Filing 40

ORDER Motion Hearing set for 2/11/2011 09:00 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2010)

Download PDF
The Board of Trustees of the California Winery Worker's Pension Trust Fund v. Union Bank, N.A. Doc. 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 UNION BANK, N.A., 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. CORY BROWN, MICHAEL CRAIN, JERRY O. ELDREDGE, HUGH FRANKLIN, JOE HALCON, ALAN PEGARELLA, ROBERT RAMIREZ, CINDY SMITH, CHARLES FEAVER, MICHAEL FRANZIA, ROBERT M. LIEBER, MARC C. MONDAVI, DIANNE NURY, FRED WIEBEL, Jr., and DOES 1-20 inclusive. Third-Party Defendants. ___________________________________________ [P r o p o se d ] Order C a s e No. C 10-2240 SI UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA WINERY WORKERS' PENSION TRUST FUND, Plaintiff, v. UNION BANK, N.A., Defendant. ___________________________________________ UNION BANK, N.A., Counter-Plaintiff, v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA WINERY WORKERS' PENSION TRUST FUND Counter-Defendant. ___________________________________________ Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 10-2240 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR THE MOTION TO D I S M I S S T H E THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AND THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: ___________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court sets the following schedule for the motions to dismiss Union Bank's Amended Counterclaim (Dkt. # 34) and Third-Party Complaint (Dkt. # 35): Replies Due: January 21, 2011 Hearing on Motions: February 11, 2011 ___________________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE [P r o p o se d ] Order C a s e No. C 10-2240 SI Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?