Croul v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Filing
45
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 44 STIPULATION to Continue Further Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/20/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2012)
Case3:10-cv-02304-JSW Document44-1 Filed04/19/12 Page1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12 MELINDA CROUL, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.,
16 and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
17
Case No. 3:10-CV-02304-JSW
CLASS ACTION
DENYING
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Defendant.
Crtrm.: 11, 19th Floor
Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White
18 Plaintiff was told to renotice the motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement for an
19
Pursuant to the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Continue the further Case Management
20 Conference, currently scheduled for May 4, 2012 at 1:30 p.m., and good cause appearing
21 therefore: open date, but has not done so. Therefore, there is no motion currently on calendar.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES the request to continue the case management conference.
22
The further Case Management Conference is continued to May 25, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., to
This Order is without prejudice to the parties again requesting to continue the case management
23 coincide with the hearing on the preliminary approval of class action settlement. The further Case
conference once the motion for preliminary approval is properly noticed.
24 Management Conference on May 4, 2012 is hereby removed from the Court’s calendar.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26 Dated:
April 20, 2012
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
District Judge, United States District Court
27
28
4841-2258-0495.1
3:10-CV-02304-JSW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?