Reid v. Accredo Health, Inc., et al

Filing 23

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from May 13, 2011 to June 10, 2011. The Joint Case Management Statement is due on or before June 3, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 11, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NICOLE A. DILLER (SBN 154842) ANGEL T. LIN (SBN 255682) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 442-1000 Facsimile: (415) 442-1001 ndiller@morganlewis.com alin@morganlewis.com Attorneys for Defendants Accredo Health Group, Inc. and Medco Health Solutions, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CATHRYN REID, Case No. CV 10-02332 MMC 12 13 vs. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM MAY 13, 2011 TO JUNE 10, 2011 Plaintiff, AND ORDER THEREON ACCREDO HEALTH, INC., a Delaware corporation; MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation; LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., an Indiana corporation; JEFFERSON PILOT FINANCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation; SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, a Canadian corporation as DOE 1; and DOES 2 to 25, inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to Local Rule 6, this stipulation is made by and between plaintiff Cathryn Reid and defendants Accredo Health Group, Inc., Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Lincoln National Life Insurance Co., Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance Company, and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, by and through their respective counsel of record, with respect to the following: WHEREAS, on August 26, 2010, the parties filed a stipulation continuing the initial case 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES DB2/22354944.2 1 STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC 1 management conference from September 3, 2010 to October 29, 2010, which the Court approved 2 on August 27, 2010; 3 4 5 WHEREAS, on October 29, 2010, the Court held an initial case management conference in this matter, which conference the Court continued to May 13, 2011; WHEREAS, as set forth in the declaration of Nicole A. Diller, lead counsel for Accredo 6 Health Group, Inc. and Medco Health Solutions, Inc. has determined that she is unavailable to 7 personally appear before the Court on May 13, 2011; 8 9 WHEREAS, the parties are willing to agree to a continuance of the case management conference so all parties can have counsel attend the conference in person; and, 10 WHEREAS, counsel for all parties have discussed their availability and determined that 11 the first available Friday on which all counsel can attend a case management conference is June 12 10, 2011; 13 14 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby jointly request, and respectfully ask the Court to order, as follows: 15 That the case management conference be continued to June 10, 2011, with a joint case 16 management conference statement due on or before June 3, 2011. 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: April 7, 2011 BARGER & WOLEN LLP 19 20 By: 21 22 /s/ Jennifer N. Lee MARTIN E. ROSEN JENNIFER N. LEE Attorneys for Defendants Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. and Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance Company 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES DB2/22354944.2 2 STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC 1 Dated: April 7, 2011 DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP 2 3 By: /s/ George J. Barron GEORGE J. BARRON 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff Cathryn Reid 5 6 7 Dated: April 7, 2011 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 8 By: /s/ Nicole A. Diller NICOLE A. DILLER ANGEL T. LIN 9 10 Attorneys for Defendants Accredo Health, Inc. and Medco Health Solutions, Inc. 11 12 13 Dated: April 7, 2011 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 14 15 16 By: /s/ Christopher M. Ahearn MARK SCHMIDTKE CHRISTOPHER M. AHEARN 17 18 Attorneys for Defendant Sun Life Assurance Company Of Canada 19 20 21 ATTESTATION 22 23 24 Pursuant to General Order 45(X), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 25 26 Dated: April 7, 2011 27 By: _/s/ Nicole A. Diller _________________ Nicole A. Diller 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES DB2/22354944.2 3 STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC DECLARATION OF NICOLE A. DILLER 1 2 1. I am a partner at the law firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (“Morgan 3 Lewis”), attorneys of record for defendants Accredo Health Group, Inc. and Medco Health 4 Solutions, Inc. I am licensed to practice law in the State of California and have been admitted to 5 practice in the Northern District of California. I have direct and personal knowledge of the facts 6 set forth in this declaration and, if called and sworn as a witness, I would competently testify to 7 these facts. 8 2. A scheduling conflict has arisen between the case management conference 9 scheduled in this matter for May 13, 2011 and another matter for which I am counsel of record, 10 which is pending in the United States District Court, District of Minnesota. The defendants in 11 that matter filed a motion to dismiss on March 21, 2011. A cancellation in the Court’s calendar 12 provided an opening for the hearing of that motion on May 13, 2011, while the next available 13 hearing was not for a number of months later. Given the case management deadlines in that 14 matter and the issues raised by the motion to dismiss, defendants determined it would best serve 15 the parties’ interests to obtain the earliest possible resolution on their motion. Among other 16 things, deferring resolution of the motion for a substantial time period would potentially subject a 17 defendant who may be dismissed by the Court’s ruling on the motion to very time consuming, 18 costly and disruptive discovery that plaintiffs will agree to defer if the motion is resolved in the 19 near future. 20 3. Rather than request to appear at the case management conference in this matter 21 telephonically on the scheduled date, I contacted counsel for all parties to seek agreement to 22 request a continuance of the case management conference to permit me to personally appear at 23 the conference. After several e-mail exchanges, counsel determined that the first available Friday 24 following May 13, 2011 on which all counsel can attend a case management conference is June 25 10, 2011. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES DB2/22354944.2 4 STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC 1 2 3 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and accurate. Executed this 7th day of April, 2011 at San Francisco, California. 4 /s/ Nicole A. Diller Nicole A. Diller 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES DB2/22354944.2 5 STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to stipulation, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 3 4 5 1. The case management conference is continued from May 13, 2011 to June 10, 2011; and 2. The joint case management conference statement is due on or before June 3, 2011. 6 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 April 11, 2011 Dated: ____________________ ______________________________ The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES DB2/22354944.2 6 STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CONFERENCE CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?