Reid v. Accredo Health, Inc., et al

Filing 25

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM JUNE 10, 2011 TO AUGUST 26, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 6, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 GEORGE J. BARRON, #53117 JONATHAN MCNEIL WONG, #112224 DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP Attorneys at Law 1999 Harrison Street, 25th Floor Oakland, California 94612-3520 P.O. Box 12979 Oakland, California 94604-2979 Telephone: (510) 451-0544 Facsimile: (510) 832-1486 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff CATHRYN REID 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 CATHRYN REID, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC Plaintiff, v. ACCREDO HEALTH GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation; MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation; LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., an Indiana corporation; JEFFERSON PILOT FINANCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation; SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, a Canadian corporation as DOE 1; and DOES 2 to 25, inclusive, STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM JUNE 10, 2011 TO AUGUST 26, 2011 AND ORDER THEREON Defendants. 22 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 6, this stipulation is made by and between plaintiff Cathryn Reid 24 and defendants Accredo Health Group, Inc., Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Lincoln National Life 25 Insurance Co., Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance Company, and Sun Life Assurance Company 26 of Canada, by and through their respective counsel of record, with respect to the following: 27 28 -1STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC 1 WHEREAS, on August 26, 2010, the parties filed a stipulation continuing the initial case 2 management conference from September 3, 2010 to October 29, 2010, which the Court approved 3 on August 27, 2010; 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, on October 29, 2010, the Court held an initial case management conference in this matter, which conference the Court continued to May 13, 2011; WHEREAS, the parties filed a stipulation continuing the May 13, 2011 case management conference to June 10, 2011, which the Court approved on April 11, 2011; 8 WHEREAS, a primary reason for continuing the earlier case management conference was 9 to allow sufficient time for plaintiff to make and complete the life insurance benefit claims herein. 10 While significant progress has been made, those claims are not complete and more time is needed 11 to do so, see Declaration of George J. Barron, attached hereto and incorporated herein by 12 reference. 13 14 15 16 WHEREAS, counsel for all parties have discussed their availability and determined that all counsel can attend a case management conference on August 26, 2011; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby jointly request, and respectfully ask the Court to order, as follows: 17 That the case management conference be continued to August 26, 18 2011, with a joint case management conference statement due on or 19 before August 19, 2011. 20 21 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 3, 2011 DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP 22 23 24 25 By: /s/ George J. Barron George J. Barron Attorneys for Plaintiff Cathryn Reid 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC 1 Dated: June 3, 2011 BARGER & WOLEN LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Jennifer N. Lee Martin E. Rosen Jennifer N. Lee 4 5 Attorneys for Defendants Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. and Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance Company 6 7 Dated: June 3, 2011 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 8 9 By: /s/ Nicole A. Diller Nicole A. Diller Angel T. Lin 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants Accredo Health, Inc. and Medco Health Solutions, Inc. 12 13 Dated: June 3, 2011 14 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 15 By: /s/ Christopher M. Ahearn Mark Schmidtke Christopher M. Ahearn 16 17 Attorneys for Defendants Sun Life Assurance Company Of Canada 18 19 ATTESTATION 20 21 22 Pursuant to General Order 45(X), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 23 24 Dated: June 3, 2011 DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP 25 26 By: /s/ George J. Barron George J. Barron 27 28 -3STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC DECLARATION OF GEORGE J. BARRON 1 2 1. I am a partner at the law firm of Donahue Gallagher Woods LLP (“Donahue”), 3 attorneys of record for plaintiff Cathryn Reid. I am licensed to practice law in the State of 4 California and have been admitted to practice in the Northern District of California. I have direct 5 and personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and, if called and sworn as a 6 witness, I would competently testify to these facts. 7 2. A primary reason for continuing the earlier case management conference herein was to 8 allow sufficient time for plaintiff to make and complete the life insurance benefit claims herein. 9 While significant progress has been made, those claims are not complete and more time is needed 10 11 12 13 14 15 to do so. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and accurate. Executed this 3rd day of June, 2011, at Oakland, California. /s/ George J. Barron George J. Barron 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to stipulation, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 3 4 1. The case management conference is continued from June 10, 2011 to August 26, 2011; and 5 2. The joint case management conference statement is due on or before August 19, 2011. 6 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 Dated: June 6, 2011 The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5STIPULATION, DECLARATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC CASE NO. CV 10-02332 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?