Ali v. U.S. Department of Education

Filing 30

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/23/2011: # 1 Envelope) (tf, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Ali v. U.S. Department of Education Doc. 30 1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DEDAN SUNNI ALI, 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 23, 2011 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge Plaintiff has not responded to this Court's February 28, 2011 Order to Show Cause, which instructed the plaintiff to contact the Court to explain why his case should not be dismissed. Docket No. 28. The Court cautioned plaintiff that failure to respond may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. Id. The Court mailed a copy of the Order to Show Cause to the address the Court has on file for plaintiff, but that document was returned as undeliverable without a forwarding address. Plaintiff has not contacted the Court about his case since June 30, 2010. Plaintiff has not responded to the pending motion to dismiss. Given these circumstances, the Court hereby DISMISSES the case WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot. Judgment is entered accordingly. The Clerk shall close the file. Plaintiff, v. US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant. / ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT No. C 10-02360 SI Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?