Osmanik v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al
Filing
219
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why counsel's motion to withdraw should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 10/1/2010. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2010)
<![CDATA[
Osmanik v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al
Doc. 219
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. 2010. Counsel for plaintiffs moved to withdraw on August 31, Doc #218 in 10-2363; Doc #210 in 10-2364. Plaintiffs are HILMIJA DZEBIC, Plaintiff, v ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP INC et al, Defendants. FIKRETA OSMANIK, Plaintiff, v ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP INC et al, Defendants. / / No C 10-2363 VRW C 10-2364 VRW ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
hereby ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing on or before October 1, 2010 why the motion to withdraw should not be granted. A further
scheduling order shall follow resolution of the motion to withdraw.
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
