Glover v. Appellate Court

Filing 14

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/28/10. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2010)

Download PDF
Glover v. Appellate Court Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 *E-Filed 9/28/10* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION HENRY GLOVER, Petitioner, v. APPELLATE COURT, Respondent. / No. C 10-2426 RS (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL INTRODUCTION This is a federal habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by a pro se state prisoner. The action was dismissed and judgment entered in favor of respondent on June 16, 2010 because petitioner failed to pay the filing fee or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis by the appropriate date. Petitioner paid the filing fee, the action was reopened, and the orders of dismissal and judgment were vacated. Petitioner was then directed to show why the petition should not be dismissed as untimely. In response to that order, petitioner has filed several letters and a large stack of mental health documents from Pelican Bay State Prison. In none of these filings, however, has petitioner articulated why his petition should not be dismissed as untimely. Accordingly, the action is hereby No. C 10-2426 RS (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of respondent, and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 28, 2010 RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 2 No. C 10-2426 RS (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?