Cazet et al v. Epps et al

Filing 102

ORDER GRANTING 101 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Cutoff. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/10/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

12

RALPH ROBINSON (State Bar No. 51436)
[e-mail]
FRANCIS TORRENCE (State Bar No. 154653)
[e-mail]
ANDREW SMITH (State Bar No. 260671)
[e-mail]
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER, LLP
525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California, 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

13

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

8
9
10
11
127 S. Main Street, Sebastopol, CA 95472
[phone] [phone] Fax

SINGLER, NAPELL & DILLON, LLP

BRYAN W. DILLON (State Bar No. 203052)
[e-mail]
JASON D. MAYNARD (State Bar No. 253076)
[e-mail]
BRUCE J. NAPELL (State Bar No. 115116)
[e-mail]
SINGLER, NAPELL & DILLON, LLP
127 S. Main Street
Sebastopol, California 95472
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

ROBERT L. CAZET, an individual, et al,

17
18
19

Plaintiffs,
vs.
TOPPA EPPS, an individual, et al

20
21

Defendants.
TOPPA EPPS, an individual, et al.

22
23
24
25
26

CASE NO: C 10-02460 JSW
ORDER ON
STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION
TO EXTEND THE DISCOVERY
MOTION CUTOFF DATE

Counterclaimants,
vs.
ROBERT L. CAZET, an individual, et al.
Counterdefendants.

27
28
1
431/004/0505.2

STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION C 10-02460 JSW

1

STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION

2

TO EXTEND THE DISCOVERY MOTION CUTOFF DATE

3
4
5

Whereas, pursuant to local rule 37-3 today, Monday, May 9, 2011 would be the discovery
motion cut-off date in the above-captioned matter; and
Whereas the parties have been meeting and conferring regarding a list of deficiencies in

6

Defendants’ document production, most of which having been discovered recently during

7

Defendants’ and third party depositions; and

8
9
10

12
13
14
15
16
17

joint letter to Magistrate Judge Beeler seeking to compel further production and certain
certifications, and also seeking a stay of this action; and
Whereas Defendants did not provide a response to this letter, but today, Monday, May 9,
2011, agreed to comply with Plaintiffs’ demands with production to begin today; and
Whereas Plaintiffs would be prejudiced by losing the opportunity to make further discovery
motions after review of Defendants’ production and certifications;
Now therefore, all parties, through their respective counsel stipulate to, and respectfully
request the Court order the following:
Plaintiffs shall have five court days, running from the time that Defendants certify that the

18

productions and certifications agreed upon today are complete, to file any joint letter/discovery

19

motion. Such letters/motions shall be in accordance with the Court’s standing order.

25
26

431/004/0505.2

ER

H

2

RT

28

ffrey S
Judge Je

NO

27

Dated: May 6, 2011
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
Scheduling Order is modified such that
Defendants shall certify the stipulated
production and certification by no later than
4 p.m., May 12, 2011, and Plaintiff may file a
joint letter by 12 noon, May 18, 2011, in
accordance with Magistrate Judge Beeler's
Dated May 10, 2011
standing order.

. White

R NIA

24

RT
U
O

23

FO

22

LI

21

SINGLER, NAPELL & DILLON, LLP
/S/ JASON D. MAYNARD
By___________________________________
Jason D. Maynard DISTR
ICT
ES
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
C
AT
T
STAINBROOK & STAINBROOK, LLP
/S/ CRAIG M. STAINBROOK
BY_______________________________
ERED
Craig M. Stainbrook ORD
SO
IT IS
Attorneys for Defendants

A

Dated: May 6, 2011

S

20

UNIT
ED

127 S. Main Street, Sebastopol, CA 95472
[phone] [phone] Fax

SINGLER, NAPELL & DILLON, LLP

11

Whereas on Thursday May 5, 2011, Plaintiffs provided Defendants with Plaintiffs’ half of a

C
OF
D OINT MOTION C 10-02460 JSW
STIPULATION AND JI S T R I C T
N