Cazet et al v. Epps et al

Filing 132

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 130 to remove incorrectly filed documents; Docket Numbers 114 through 119-4. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/27/2011. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document130 1 2 3 4 Filed05/26/11 Page1 of 3 Craig M. Stainbrook, Calif. State Bar #160876 STAINBROOK & STAINBROOK, LLP 412 Aviation Boulevard, Suite H Santa Rosa, California 95403 707.578.9333 phone 707.578.3133 fax E-mail: craig@northbay-iplaw.com 5 6 7 8 9 Robert B. Golden, admitted pro hac vice LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP One Chase Road Scarsdale, New York 10583 914.723.4300 phone 914.723.4301 fax E-mail: rgolden@LSLLP.com 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants TOPPA EPPS, CAMMERON RIPLEY, EDWARD HAYMAN, and AAUSA, LLC 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO 14 15 16 ROBERT L. CAZET, an individual, et al. 17 Plaintiffs, CASE NO. C 10-02460 JSW 18 v. 19 20 TOPPA EPPS, an individual, et al. Defendants. 21 22 TOPPA EPPS, an individual, et al. 23 24 STIPULATION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS; DOCKET NUMBERS 114 THROUGH 119-4 Counterclaimants, v. 25 ROBERT L. CAZET, an individual, et al. 26 27 Counterdefendants. 28 1 Stipulation to Remove Incorrectly Filed Documents; Docket Nos. 114-119 Case No. C 10 02460 JSW Case3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document130 Filed05/26/11 Page2 of 3 1 STIPULATION 2 WHEREAS, on May 20, 2011, Defendants/Counterclaimants filed Defendants’ Notice of 3 Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities 4 in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, and Declaration of Robert B. Golden in Support of 5 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, including Exhibits 1, 3-8, 10, 12-17, 20 and 21 thereto, 6 now bearing ECF-CAND Doc Nos. 114 through 119-4. 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(b) and the Court’s Protective Order for this case (See 8 ECF Document No. 66), when electronically filed, the above-described papers could only have been 9 lodged under seal or agreement of the parties, but were not. 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the recommendation and request of the Court Clerk on May 26, 2011, 11 that if the parties did not disagree on withdrawal of the incorrectly filed documents, counsel for 12 Defendants should withdraw Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed 13 Documents; Docket Numbers 114 through 119-4, and file instead a Stipulation for same. 14 WHEREAS, the parties agree the documents should be withdrawn. 15 /// 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 2 Stipulation to Remove Incorrectly Filed Documents; Docket Nos. 114-119 Case No. C 10 02460 JSW Case3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document130 Filed05/26/11 Page3 of 3 1 NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree 2 that Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ 3 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, and 4 Declaration of Robert B. Golden in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, as filed 5 on May 20, 2011, be permanently removed and deleted from the record. 6 7 DATED: May 26, 2011 STAINBROOK & STAINBROOK, LLP 8 By /Craig M. Stainbrook/ Craig M. Stainbrook Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants 9 10 11 Dated: May 26, 2011 SINGLER, NAPELL & DILLON, LLP 12 13 By 14 /Bryan W. Dillon/ Bryan W. Dillon Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants 15 16 17 ORDER 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 May 27, 2011 Dated: ________________ Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation to Remove Incorrectly Filed Documents; Docket Nos. 114-119 Case No. C 10 02460 JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?