Cazet et al v. Epps et al
Filing
132
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 130 to remove incorrectly filed documents; Docket Numbers 114 through 119-4. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/27/2011. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)
Case3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document130
1
2
3
4
Filed05/26/11 Page1 of 3
Craig M. Stainbrook, Calif. State Bar #160876
STAINBROOK & STAINBROOK, LLP
412 Aviation Boulevard, Suite H
Santa Rosa, California 95403
707.578.9333 phone
707.578.3133 fax
E-mail: craig@northbay-iplaw.com
5
6
7
8
9
Robert B. Golden, admitted pro hac vice
LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP
One Chase Road
Scarsdale, New York 10583
914.723.4300 phone
914.723.4301 fax
E-mail: rgolden@LSLLP.com
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants
TOPPA EPPS, CAMMERON RIPLEY,
EDWARD HAYMAN, and AAUSA, LLC
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO
14
15
16
ROBERT L. CAZET, an individual, et al.
17
Plaintiffs,
CASE NO. C 10-02460 JSW
18
v.
19
20
TOPPA EPPS, an individual, et al.
Defendants.
21
22
TOPPA EPPS, an individual, et al.
23
24
STIPULATION TO REMOVE
INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS;
DOCKET NUMBERS 114 THROUGH 119-4
Counterclaimants,
v.
25
ROBERT L. CAZET, an individual, et al.
26
27
Counterdefendants.
28
1
Stipulation to Remove Incorrectly Filed
Documents; Docket Nos. 114-119
Case No. C 10 02460 JSW
Case3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document130
Filed05/26/11 Page2 of 3
1
STIPULATION
2
WHEREAS, on May 20, 2011, Defendants/Counterclaimants filed Defendants’ Notice of
3
Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities
4
in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, and Declaration of Robert B. Golden in Support of
5
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, including Exhibits 1, 3-8, 10, 12-17, 20 and 21 thereto,
6
now bearing ECF-CAND Doc Nos. 114 through 119-4.
7
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(b) and the Court’s Protective Order for this case (See
8
ECF Document No. 66), when electronically filed, the above-described papers could only have been
9
lodged under seal or agreement of the parties, but were not.
10
WHEREAS, pursuant to the recommendation and request of the Court Clerk on May 26, 2011,
11
that if the parties did not disagree on withdrawal of the incorrectly filed documents, counsel for
12
Defendants should withdraw Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed
13
Documents; Docket Numbers 114 through 119-4, and file instead a Stipulation for same.
14
WHEREAS, the parties agree the documents should be withdrawn.
15
///
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
2
Stipulation to Remove Incorrectly Filed
Documents; Docket Nos. 114-119
Case No. C 10 02460 JSW
Case3:10-cv-02460-JSW Document130
Filed05/26/11 Page3 of 3
1
NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree
2
that Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’
3
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, and
4
Declaration of Robert B. Golden in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, as filed
5
on May 20, 2011, be permanently removed and deleted from the record.
6
7
DATED: May 26, 2011
STAINBROOK & STAINBROOK, LLP
8
By /Craig M. Stainbrook/
Craig M. Stainbrook
Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants
9
10
11
Dated: May 26, 2011
SINGLER, NAPELL & DILLON, LLP
12
13
By
14
/Bryan W. Dillon/
Bryan W. Dillon
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants
15
16
17
ORDER
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
May 27, 2011
Dated: ________________
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation to Remove Incorrectly Filed
Documents; Docket Nos. 114-119
Case No. C 10 02460 JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?