Cazet et al v. Epps et al

Filing 88

STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER Case Management Conference set for 5/13/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/5/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Craig M. Stainbrook, Calif. State Bar #160876 STAINBROOK & STAINBROOK, LLP 412 Aviation Boulevard, Suite H Santa Rosa, California 95403 707.578.9333 phone 707.578.3133 fax E-mail: craig@northbay-iplaw.com Robert B. Golden, Esq., admitted pro hac vice LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP Lackenbach Siegel Building One Chase Road Scarsdale, New York 10583 914.723.4300 phone 914.723.4301 fax E-mail: rgolden@LSLLP.com Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants TOPPA EPPS, CAMMERON RIPLEY, EDWARD HAYMAN, and AAUSA, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT L. CAZET, an individual, et al. Plaintiffs, v. TOPPA EPPS, an individual, et al. Defendants. CASE NO. C 10-02460 JSW STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER] 22 23 24 25 26 27 TOPPA EPPS, an individual, et al. Counterclaimants, v. ROBERT L. CAZET, an individual, et al. Counterdefendants. 28 STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER Case No. C 10 02460-JSW 1 1 2 3 4 The Court entered the original Order Scheduling Trial and Pretrial Matters on November 8, 2010 [ECF-CAND Doc. 59]. On the same date, the Court ordered the parties to this action to conduct an Early Neutral Evaluation by February 28, 2011, to conclude fact discovery by March 1, 2011, to file certification that all written discovery had been supplemented by January 28, 2011, and to 5 6 7 8 9 10 conclude expert discovery by April 7, 2011. On January 28, 2011, on stipulation and joint motion by the parties, the Court modified the Scheduling Order and ordered that the parties complete a private mediation on or before February 28, 2011, that the deadline to complete fact discovery would be extended to April 1, 2011, that the parties serve supplemental responses to written discovery no later than 10 days after the close of fact 11 12 13 14 15 16 discovery and file a certification that supplementation is complete, and that expert discovery be extended to May 7, 2011. The mediation process was sustained and protracted and endured from the mediation meeting, which took place on February 15, 2011, through ongoing efforts that lasted until the first week of March. With the expectation that a settlement might be reached, both parties deferred conducting 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 expensive and time-consuming discovery, and only after it became clear that a settlement could not be achieved did the parties recommence the extensive discovery effort entailed by this case. On March 11, 2010, again on Stipulation and Joint Motion for An Order Modifying Scheduling Order, the Court continued the date to complete fact discovery from April 1, 2010 to May 2, 2010, and that no later than 10 days after the close of fact discovery, all parties shall serve any supplemental responses to written discovery, and lead counsel shall file with the Court a certification 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER Case No. C 10 02460-JSW that supplementation is complete. On March 28, 2011, the Court granted Defendant's Motion to Extend or Clarify the Time to File Motions for Summary Judgment, Pursuant to Local Rules 6-3, 7-1, and 7-11. Pursuant to the 2 1 2 3 4 Court's Order [ECF-CAND Doc. 85] the parties are to meet and confer on a briefing schedule on cross-motions for summary judgment whereby the opening brief on one party's summary judgment motion shall be filed by May 20, 2011; the other party shall file its opposition and opening crosssummary judgment brief by June 3, 20-11; the reply in support of the opening motion and opposition 5 6 7 8 9 10 to the cross-motion must be filed by June 17, 2011; the reply in support of the cross-motion must be filed by June 24, 2001. The Court further Ordered that the hearing on the motions for summary judgment be continued from June 10, 2011 to July 15, 2011 at 9:00 am, and that the trial date be continued from September 12, 2011 to November 28, 2011. Other scheduling matters are to be addressed in the parties joint statement filed in advance of the further case management conference 11 12 13 14 15 16 set for April 15, 2011. Plaintiffs and Defendants are currently engaged in taking depositions, with several remaining on each side. Both sides continue to update discovery responses and produce documents and things responsive to earlier filed discovery requests. Depositions of two Defendants are scheduled to take place either April 13-14 or 14-15 in Atlanta, Georgia; depositions of two Plaintiffs are currently 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 being scheduled for April 27-28; depositions of third party witnesses are also being scheduled for the week of April 25-29. Counsel for each side remain flexible in scheduling depositions and cooperating with each other in an effort to complete fact discovery by the presently set deadline of May 2, 2010. The further case management conference is currently set for April 15, 2010. The parties are mindful that the purpose of interim pretrial conferences is to allow for a periodic review of the initial scheduling order and to give consideration to such matters as narrowing of issues, the appropriateness 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER Case No. C 10 02460-JSW and timing of summary adjudication, amendments to pleadings, and so forth. In view of these established purposes, and further in view of the discovery remaining in the case, as well as the difficulty of coordinating long distance travel to attend the interim scheduling conference, the parties 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER Case No. C 10 02460-JSW ORDER The further case management conference is hereby continued to May 13, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. It is so ordered. April 5, 2011 Dated: _______________ Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?