la Rose v. Social Security Administration et al

Filing 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/4/2010 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/14/10. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2010)

Download PDF
la Rose v. Social Security Administration et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 **E-filed 10/14/10** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SVEND LA ROSE, v. Plaintiff, No. C 10-2472 RS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ Plaintiff filed this action on June 4, 2010. On June 16, 2010, the then-assigned magistrate judge sent a letter directing plaintiff to either consent or decline to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge no later than June 25, 2010. Plaintiff did not respond, and the action was reassigned to the undersigned. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application was granted. On July 23, 2010, the Clerk of the Court requested plaintiff to provide addresses for service on defendants, to permit compliance with the order granting in forma pauperis status. Plaintiff has not responded. On October 14, 2010, the duly-noticed initial Case Management Conference was called, but plaintiff failed to appear. Accordingly, on November 4, 2010, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 3, Seventeenth Floor of the Court, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA, plaintiff Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 shall appear and show cause, if any, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to appear will result in dismissal of the action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/14/10 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?