Frost v. Aurora Loan Servicing, LLC et al

Filing 60

NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF THAT HE MUST STILL RESPOND TO THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 22, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JAMES WILLIAM FROST,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 10-02476 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

14

AURORA LOAN SERVICING, LLC, and
AURORA BANK FSB,

15

Defendants.

NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF THAT HE
MUST STILL RESPOND TO THE
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
/

16
17

Plaintiff did not timely respond to defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint by July 6,

18

and an order to show cause issued, requiring plaintiff to respond by August 1, 2011, and show

19

cause for his failure to respond to the motion. The order to show cause specifically stated that it

20

did not constitute permission to file a late opposition.

21

Plaintiff filed a late opposition on July 19, which was entered by the Clerk’s Office on

22

July 20. Plaintiff shall be on notice that he must still respond to the order to show cause and

23

show cause for his failure to timely respond to the motion, by his deadline of August 1. Whether

24

the opposition will be accepted will await such response by plaintiff.

25
26
27
28

Dated: July 22, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE