Frost v. Aurora Loan Servicing, LLC et al
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF THAT HE MUST STILL RESPOND TO THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 22, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES WILLIAM FROST,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 10-02476 WHA
AURORA LOAN SERVICING, LLC, and
AURORA BANK FSB,
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF THAT HE
MUST STILL RESPOND TO THE
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff did not timely respond to defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint by July 6,
and an order to show cause issued, requiring plaintiff to respond by August 1, 2011, and show
cause for his failure to respond to the motion. The order to show cause specifically stated that it
did not constitute permission to file a late opposition.
Plaintiff filed a late opposition on July 19, which was entered by the Clerk’s Office on
July 20. Plaintiff shall be on notice that he must still respond to the order to show cause and
show cause for his failure to timely respond to the motion, by his deadline of August 1. Whether
the opposition will be accepted will await such response by plaintiff.
Dated: July 22, 2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?